期刊文献+

多属性决策中赋权方法的自适应选择研究 被引量:2

Research on adaptive selection based on weighted method in multiple attribute decision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决多属性决策中众多赋权方法难以选择的问题,对主客观权值向量冲突因子与评估结果精度的相关性进行了分析,进而提出了一种基于冲突阈值的自适应选择算法。通过实验仿真,结果表明:该算法消除了主、客观权值向量冲突对评估结果的影响,提高了计算精度,实现了基于冲突阈值的自适应选择。而且,当冲突因子小于阈值时,自适应选择算法将选择算法时间复杂度低于乘法合成原理的综合赋权法。当冲突因子大于阈值时,选择计算结果准确度高的基于博弈论的综合赋权法。 To solve the problem of the difficulty selecting many weighting methods in multiple attribute decision, the correlation between subjective and objective weighted vector conflict factor and the assessment result accuracy is analyzed,and then, an adaptive selection algorithm based on conflict threshold is proposed. As verified by the simulation, the results show that the algorithm eliminates the effect on subjective and objective weighted vector conflict to the evaluation result,improves the calculation accuracy, and realizes the adaptive selection based on conflict threshold. Moreover, when the conflict factor is less than the threshold, adaptive selection algorithm will choose time complexity been lower than integrated weighting method of the multiplicative synthesis principle. On the contrary, when the conflict factor is greater than the threshold, it will choose the combination weighted method of high calculation result accuracy based on game theory.
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第11期215-220,共6页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.61201118) 陕西省教育厅课题(No.2013KRM07) 陕西省科技厅课题(No.2013KJ0742)
关键词 冲突因子 权值向量 自适应 阈值 conflict factor weighted vector adaptive threshold
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Hsu P F,Chiang H Y,Wang C M.Optimal selection of international exhibition agency by using the Delphi method and AHP[J].Taylor&Francis,2011,32(6):1353-1369.
  • 2程明熙.处理多目标决策问题的二项系数加权和法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1983,3(4):23-26. 被引量:57
  • 3陆明生.多目标决策中的权系数[J].系统工程理论与实践,1986,6(4):77-78. 被引量:50
  • 4马云东,胡明东.改进的AHP法及其在多目标决策中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,17(6):40-44. 被引量:77
  • 5Buckley J J,Feuring T,Hayashi Y.Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited[J].European Journal of Operational Research,200l,129(l):48-64.
  • 6Sun C C.A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37(12):7745-7754.
  • 7Chen V Y C,Lien H P,Liu C H,et al.Fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting the best environment-watershed plan[J].Applied Soft Computing,2011,11(1):265-275.
  • 8Shieh J I,Wu H H,Liu H C.Applying a complexitybased Choquet integral to evaluate students’performance[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2008,36(3):5100-5106.
  • 9Kojadinovic I.Estimation of the weights of interacting criteria from the set of profiles by means of informationtheoretic functional[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2004,155(3):741-751.
  • 10Wang Jianrong,Fan Kai,Wang Wanshan.Integration of fuzzy AHP and FPP with TOPSIS methodology for aero engine health assessment[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2010,37(12):8516-8526.

二级参考文献51

共引文献291

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部