期刊文献+

2016年脓毒症最新定义与诊断标准:回归本质重新出发 被引量:110

New definition and clinical criteria for sepsis and septic shock in 2016: back to the nature, head for the future
原文传递
导出
摘要 脓毒症是导致危重病患者死亡的主要原因之一.脓毒症和脓毒性休克的定义于1991年提出,于2001年修订.随着研究者对脓毒症病理生理机制研究的深入,以及脓毒症临床治疗的不断改观,美国重症医学会与欧洲重症医学会于2016年2月对脓毒症和脓毒性休克的定义予以更新.本文将回顾脓毒症定义的历史沿革,介绍脓毒症和脓毒性休克的最新定义,并展望该定义将产生的重要影响.脓毒症和脓毒性休克的最新定义和诊断标准,将为相关临床研究提供重要参考依据,有望在早期识别和治疗脓毒症患者中发挥关键作用. Sepsis is a leading cause of death in critically ill patients.The definitions of sepsis and septic shock were introduced in 1991 and last revised in 2001.Since considerable advances had occurred to its pathophysiology and management,an update definitions for sepsis and septic shock were released in February 2016 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.This article is to review the development and limitations of previous versions of sepsis definition,and summarize the sepsis 3.0 definition and its clinical diagnosis criteria.These updated definitions and clinical criteria will play vital roles in providing important reference frame for clinical trials,and facilitating early recognition and timely management of patients with sepsis.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期259-262,共4页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81201492 81270128 81471845) 上海青年医师资助计划(20141093)
关键词 脓毒症 休克 脓毒性 诊断 Sepsis Shock,septic Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third In- ternational Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA,2016,315(8):801-810. DOI:I0.1001/ jama. 2016.0287.
  • 2Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock : for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [J]. JAMA,2016,315(8):775-787. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
  • 3Seymour CW, Liu VX, lwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of clln- ical criteria for sepsis: for the Third International Consensus Def- initions tbr Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) [ J]. JAMA, 2016,315(8) :762-774.D01: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
  • 4Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. American Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure lines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis [ J ] Med, 1992,20(6) : 864-874.
  • 5College of Consensus and guide- Crit Care Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. International Sepsis Definitions Conference. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS In- ternational Sepsis Definitions Conference [ J]. Intensive Care Med, 2003,29 (4) : 530-538.
  • 6Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Pilcher D, et al. Systemic inflam- matory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2015,372(17) : 1629-1638. DOI: 10. 1056/NEJMoa- 1415236.
  • 7Vincent JL, Mira JP, Antonelli M. Sepsis: older and newer concepts. Lancet Respir Med, 2016, 4 ( 3 ) : 237-240. DOI: 10. 1016/$2213-2600( 15)00522-6.
  • 8Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2015,372(14) : 1301-1311.DOI : 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896.
  • 9ARISE Investigators, ANZICS Clinieal Trials Group, Peake SL, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock[ J]. N Engl J Med,2014,371 (16) : 1496-1506.DOI: 10. 1056/NEJMoa1404380.
  • 10ProCESS Investigators, Yealy DM, Kellum JA, et al. A ran- domized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock [ J ] N Engl J Med,2014,370(18): 1683-1693. DOI: 10.1056/NEJ- Moa1401602.

二级参考文献54

  • 1Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Pilcher D, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis [J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372 (17): 1629-1638. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoaI415236.
  • 2Shankar-Hari M, Deutschman CS, Singer M. Do we need a new definition of sepsis? [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2015, 41 (5): 909-911. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3680-x.
  • 3Vellinga NA, Boerma EC, Koopmans M, et al. International study on microcirculatory shock occurrence in acutely ill patients [J]. Crit Care Med, 2015, 43 (1): 48-56. DOI: 10.1097/CCM. 0000000000000553.
  • 4Casserly B, Phillips GS, Schorr C, et al. Lactate measurements in sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion: results from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign database [J]. Crit Care Med, 2015, 43 (3): 567- 573. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000742.
  • 5Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock [J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372 (14): 1301-1311. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896.
  • 6Angus DC, Barnato AE, Bell D, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: the ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2015, 41 (9): 1549-1560. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3822-1.
  • 7Gupta RG, Flartigan SM, Kashiouris MG, et al. Early goal-directed resuscitation of patients with septic shock: current evidence and future directions [J]. Crit Care, 2015, 19 : 286. DOI: 10.1186/ s13054-015-1011-9.
  • 8Saugel B, Trepte C J, Heckel K, et al. Hemodynamic management of septic shock: is it time for "individualized goal-directed hemodynamic therapy" and for specifically targeting themicrocirculation? [J]. Shock, 2015, 43 (6): 522-529. DOI: 10.1097/ SHK.0000000000000345.
  • 9Rhodes A, Phillips G, Beale R, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence Study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study) [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2015, 41 (9): 1620-1628. DOI: 10.1007/ s00134-015-3906-y.
  • 10Levy MM, Rhodes A, Phillips GS, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5- year study [J]. Crit Care Med, 2015, 43 (1): 3-12. DOI: 10.1097/.

共引文献11

同被引文献766

引证文献110

二级引证文献736

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部