期刊文献+

^(18)F-FDG-PET/CT对复发转移性乳腺癌疗效预测价值的临床研究 被引量:4

Clinical study of the early prediction value of ^(18)F-FDG-PET/CT to chemotherapy efficacy in recurrent and metastatic breast cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 18氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射成像/电子计算机断层扫描(18 F-FDG-PET/CT)不仅可提供肿瘤大小等解剖学信息,而且可从细胞分子水平反映人体生化和代谢变化,本研究旨在对18F-FDG-PET/CT早期预测复发转移性乳腺癌治疗缓解率的价值进行初步研究。方法选择2010-01-01-2014-12-31复发转移的乳腺癌患者18例,所有患者均于治疗前(PET/CT1)和治疗1个周期后(PET/CT2)分别显像1次。根据近期疗效分为客观缓解(OR)组(n=10)和非客观缓解(non-OR)组(n=8),分析OR组和non-OR组之间PET/CT1SUVmax、PET/CT2SUVmax、ΔSUVmax和SUVmax变化率的差异。SUVmax变化率以20.00%为界值,≥20%为代谢反应组(n=12),<20.00%为无代谢组(n=6),分析代谢反应组与无代谢反应组患者OR、DCR的差异。结果 OR组患者的ΔSUVmax为2.609±0.299,显著高于non-OR组的0.975±0.395,t=3.368,P=0.003 9;OR组SUVmax变化率为(37.250±3.102)%,明显高于non-OR组(16.300±4.111)%,t=4.148,P=0.000 8;代谢反应组缓解率为83.33%,明显优于无代谢反应组,差异均有统计学意义,χ2=13.92,P<0.001。结论 18F-FDG-PET/CT对复发转移性乳腺癌治疗缓解率具有重要的早期临床预测价值。 OBJECTIVE To explore the early prediction value of 18 F-FDG-PET / CT for chemotherapy remission rates in recurrent and metastasis of breast cancer patients. METHODS Eighteen patients diagnosed with recurrent metastatic breast cancer between Jan. 1,2010 and Dec. 31,2014 were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent PET/CT examination before (PET/CT1) and after (PET/CT2) chemotherapy. According to the objective remission, patients were divided into OR group (n = 10) and non-OR group (n=8). According to the change rate of SUVmax, patients were divided into metabolic responsive group (n=12) and non-responsive group (n= 6). The differences of PET/CT1 SUVmax, PET/CT2 SUVmax and the change rate of SUVmax between OR group and non-OR group, as well as the difference of OR rate and disease control rate (DCR) between the metabolic responsive group and non-responsive group were analyzed. RESULTS The ASUVmax in OR group (2. 609±0. 299) was significantly higher than that in non-OR group (0. 975 ± 0. 395), t= 3. 368, P= 0. 003 9, and the change rate of SUVmax in OR group (37. 250 ±3. 102)% was significantly higher than that of non-OR group (16. 300 ±4. 111)%, t = 4. 148, P = 0. 000 8. The remission rate of metabolic response group was 83.33%, which was significantly higher than that of non-responder group, χ^2 =13.92, P〈0. 001. The differences were all statistically significant. CONCLUSION PET/CT has important clinical value in early prediction of chemotherapy efficacy in patients with recurrent and metastatic breast cancer.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第5期308-312,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
基金 苏州市科技计划(SYS201062 SYS201308)
关键词 PET/CT 复发转移乳腺癌 代谢反应 预测 PET/CT recurrent and metastatic breast cancer metabolic response pridiction
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Coloff JL, Macintyre AN, Nichols AG, et al. Akt-dependent glu- cose metabolism promotes Mcl-1 synthesis to maintain cell survival and resistance to Bcl-2 inhibition[J]. Cancer Res, 2011,71 (15): 5204-5213.
  • 2Ordu C, Selcuk NA, Erdogan E, et al. Does early PET/CT as- sesment of response to chemotherapy predicts survival in patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer [J]. Medicine, 2014, 93(28) :e299.
  • 3Humbert O, Cochet A, Riedinger JM et al. HERZ-positive breast canc- er:18F-FDG PET for early predictionof response to trastuzumab plus taxane-basedneoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Ima- ging,2014,41(8) :1525-1533.
  • 4Eisenhauer EA. Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response e- valuation criteria in solid turnouts: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)[J]. EurJ Cancer, 2009, 45(2):228-247.
  • 5Cortfis-Funes H. Contribution of PET-CT in diagnostic- thera'- peuticdecisions in medical oncology (in Spanish) [J]. Rev Esp Med Nucl,2008,27 : 79-82.
  • 6Groheux D, Hatt M, Hindifi E, et al. Estrogen receptor-posi- tive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast tumors: early prediction of chemosensitivity with 18F-fluorode- oxyglucose positron emission tomography/compute tomography during neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Cancer, 2013, 119 (11) : 1960-1968.
  • 7Buchbender C, Kuemmel S, Hoffmann O, et al. FDG-PET/CT for the early prediction of histopathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: initial re- suits[J]. Acta Radiol,2012,53(6) :628-636.
  • 8Cheng X, Li Y, Liu B, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for e- valuation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis[J]. Acta Radiol, 2012,53(6) : 615-627.
  • 9Mghanga FP, Lan X, Bakari KH, et al. Huorine-18 fluorodeoxyglu- cose positron emission tomography-computed tomngraphy in monitoring the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-a-nalysis[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2013,13(4):271-279.
  • 10Chen YM, Pan XF, Tong LJ, et al. Can 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography predict responses to neoadjuvant therapy inoesophageal cancer patients? A meta-analysis[J]. Nu- el Med Commun,2011,32(11) :1005-1010.

二级参考文献12

  • 1朱丽萍,波拉提,倪多.新辅助化疗在乳腺癌保乳手术中的应用[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2005,10(3):308-309. 被引量:5
  • 2Scholl SM, Fourquet A, Asselain B, et al. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with tumors considered too large for breast conserving surgery:prellminary results of a randornised trial[J]. Eur J Cancer, 1994,30:645-652.
  • 3Biersack HJ, Bender H, Palmedo H. FDG-PET in monitoring therapy of breast cancer[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag,2004,31. 112-117.
  • 4Eubank WB, Mankoff DA. Evolving role of positron emission tomography in breast cancer imaging [ J ]. Semin Nucl Med,2005, 35: 84-99.
  • 5Bellon JR, Livingston RB, Eubank WB, et al. Evaluation of the internal mammary lymph nodes by FDG-PET in locally advanced breast cancer ( LABC ) [ J ]. Am J Clin Oncol, 2004, 27 : 407-410.
  • 6Dietl B, Marienhagen J. The therapeutic impact of (18)F-FDG whole body PET: a radiooncologist's view [ J ]. Nuklearmedizin,2005, 44: 8-14.
  • 7Schelling M, Avril N, Nahrig J, et al. Positron emission tomography using [( 18 ) F] Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2000, 18:1689-1695.
  • 8Jansson T, Westlin JE, Ahlstrom H, et al. Positron emission tomography studies in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer:a method for early therapy evaluation [ J ] ? J Clin Oncol, 1995, 13: 1470-1477.
  • 9Kim SJ, Kim SK, Lee ES, et al. Predictive value of [ 18F]FDG PET for pathological response of breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy[J]. Ann Oncol, 2004, 15: 1352-1357.
  • 10Inoue T, Yutani K, Taguchi T, et al. Preoperative evaluation of prognosis in breast cancer patients by [ ( 18 ) F]2-Deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography [ J ]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol,2004, 130 : 273-278.

共引文献9

同被引文献20

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部