期刊文献+

高、中b值DWI瘤周水肿区ADC值对鉴别恶性胶质瘤和单发转移瘤的价值 被引量:3

Apparent diffusion coefficient value of high and moderate b value DWI in peritumoral edema regions for differentiating malignant glioma and solitary brain metastasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨高、中b值扩散加权成像(DWI)瘤周水肿区表观扩散系数(ADC)值对恶性胶质瘤与单发转移瘤的鉴别诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析经手术病理的18例恶性胶质瘤和15例单发脑转移瘤患者的MRI资料,均行常规MRI检查和2种b的DWI检查(b=1 000 s/mm^2、3 000 s/mm^2),测量瘤体及瘤周表观扩散系数(ADC)值,对不同b值瘤周水肿区的ADC值绘制ROC曲线,寻找最佳诊断阈值。结果:恶性胶质瘤与单发脑转移瘤瘤周水肿区的ADC 1 000、ADC 3 000分别为:(1.123±0.148)×10^(-3)mm^2/s和(1.538±0.184)×10^(-3)mm^2/s、(1.032±0.097)×10^(-3)mm^2/s和(1.242±0.102)×10-3mm^2/s,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。当ADC 1 000取1.30×10^(-3)mm^2/s作为鉴别恶性胶质瘤和单发转移瘤的诊断阈值时,其诊断价值较高,敏感度和特异度分别为93.3%、72.2%。结论:瘤周水肿区ADC值有助于恶性别胶质瘤与转移瘤的鉴别,b值取1 000 s/mm2时瘤周水肿ADC值对于二者鉴别最佳。 Objective:To investigate the value of diffusion-weighted imaging( DWI) with moderate and high b value by analyzing the apparent diffusion coefficient obtained from peritumoral edema in diagnosing malignant glioma and solitary brain metastasis.Methods:18 high grade gliomas and 15 solitary metastasis with pathologicallyproved were studied retrospectively.All patients received conventional MRI and DWI examination with 2 different b values( 1 000 s/mm2,3 000 s/mm2).ADC values of different b value within the tumor and peritumoral area were measured.Results:The ADC 1 000 and ADC 3 000 in the peritumoral regions of high grade gliomas was significantly lower than that of solitary metastasis( 1.123±0.148)×10-3mm2/s and( 1.538±0.184)×10-3mm2/s,( 1.032±0.097)×10-3mm2/s and( 1.242±0.102)×10-3mm2/s respectively with statistically significant(P〈0.05).When ADC 1 000 took 1.30×10-3mm2/s as the diagnostic threshold value for high grade gliomas and solitary metastasis,the sensitivity and specificity were 93.3% and 72.2% respectively.Conclusion:The ADC values in peritumoral edema is helpful and the b-value of 1 000 s/mm2 is optimal in differentiating high-grade glioma and solitary metastasis.
出处 《华夏医学》 CAS 2016年第1期48-51,共4页 Acta Medicinae Sinica
基金 广西卫生厅课题资助(Z2013495)
关键词 脑肿瘤 瘤周水肿 扩散加权成像 表观扩散系数 brain tumor peritumoral edema diffusion-weighted imaging apparent diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Stupp R,Tonn J C,Brada M,et al.High-grade malignant glio- ma:ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis,treat- ment and follow-up [ J ] .Ann Oncol,2010,21 (5): 190-193.
  • 2Upadhyay N,Waldman A D.Conventional MRI evaluation of gliomas [ J ] .Br J Radiol,2011,84(12):S 107-S111.
  • 3李培岭,张敏,张斌青,翟昭华.高b值DWI最小ADC值在胶质瘤术前分级中的应用价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2014,33(10):1479-1484. 被引量:11
  • 4Pavlisa G,Rados M,Pavlisa G,et al.The differences of water diffusion between brain tissue infiltrated by tumor and peri- tumoral vasogenic edema [ J ] .Clin Imaging,2009,33(2):96- 101.
  • 5黄薇园,余永强,钱银锋,罗艺,王乐.MR扩散加权成像瘤周水肿区ADC值在脑肿瘤鉴别诊断中的价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2010,29(1):27-30. 被引量:23
  • 6Hayashida Y,Hirai T,Morishita S,et al.Diffusion-weighted imaging of metastatic brain tumors: comparison with histo- logic type and tumor cellularity [J ] .Am J Neuroradiol, 2006,27 (7): 1419 - 1425.
  • 7Lee E J,terBrugge K,Mikulis D,et al.Diagnostic value of per- itumoral minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for differ- entiation of glioblastoma multiforme from solitary metastat- ic lesions [ J ] .A JR Am J Roentgenol,2011,196(1):71-76.
  • 8王萍,翟昭华,唐光才,韩福刚,舒健.扩散加权成像鉴别诊断恶性胶质瘤与单发脑转移瘤的b值优化[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2014,22(7):487-490. 被引量:15
  • 9李玉华,陆建平,段秀杰,张忠阳.多b值DWI在儿童脑肿瘤中的初步研究[J].放射学实践,2012,27(2):159-163. 被引量:29
  • 10Server A,Kulle B,Maehlen J,etal.Quantitative apparent dif- fusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema [ J ] .Acta Radiol,2009, 50(6):682-689.

二级参考文献24

  • 1张冰,朱斌.DWI在胶质瘤与单发转移瘤及其瘤周水肿中的诊断价值[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2006,12(2):80-83. 被引量:22
  • 2叶劲,钟书,梁有明,唐秀文,蓝胜勇,曾敬初,刘若平,肖泉.儿童脑肿瘤的临床治疗及病理特点研究[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2007,28(6):286-289. 被引量:11
  • 3Calli C, Kitis O, Yunten N, et al. Perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in enhancing malignant cerebral tumors. Eur J Radial ,2006,58:394.
  • 4Stadlbauer A, Ganslandt O, Buslei R, et al. Gliomas: histopathologic evaluation of changes in directionality and magnitude of water diffusion at diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology,2006,240 : 803.
  • 5Server A, Kulle B, Maehlen J, et al. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients in the characterization of brain tumors and associated peritumoral edema. Acta Radiol,2009 ,50 :682.
  • 6Lu S, Ahn D, Johnson G, et al. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of intraeranial neoplasia and associated peritumoral edema :introduction of the tumor infiltration index. Radiology ,2004 ,232:221.
  • 7Bulakbasi N, Kocaoglu M, Ors F, et al. Combination of single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy and apparent diffusion coefficient calculation in the evaluation of common brain tumors. AJNR,2003,24:225.
  • 8Sinha S, Bastin ME, Whittle IR, et al. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of high-grade cerebral gliomas. AJNR ,2002,23:520.
  • 9Rizzo L, Crasto SG, Moruno PG, et al. Role of diffusion-and perfusion-weighted MR imaging for brain tumour characterisation. Radiol Med,2009 ,114 :645.
  • 10Louis DN, Ohqaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol,2007, 114:97.

共引文献72

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部