摘要
20世纪末,在"张、吴"笔墨问题之争中,张仃认为,中国画的本体是"笔墨",创新时要守住笔墨的底线。而吴冠中认为,笔墨只是奴才,由于时代的发展和艺术家情感的变化,旧有的笔墨样式在中国画创新中已经失去了某种意义,其价值等于零。站在时代发展和创新的角度,对他们两人的观点进行综合评估,吴冠中的笔墨观点,为中国画展示了极大的创新空间,更能符合中国画发展的需要。
At the end of the 20 th century,Zhang Ting considered brush and ink as the body of Chinese painting,and the base line should be held during innovation time.While in Wu Guanzhong' s opinion,the brushwork was slave,whose old pattern with nonsense value had lost its significance in Chinese painting creation because of the development of times and the change of artists' emotion.This paper gives a comprehensive evaluation of the two people' s viewpoints from the perspective of development of times and innovation,pointing out that Wu' s opinion about brush and ink shows a huge creative space for Chinese painting which is more suitable for its development.
出处
《吉林艺术学院学报》
2016年第2期25-29,共5页
Journal of Jilin University of Arts
关键词
张仃
吴冠中
笔墨
底线
零
Zhang Ting
Wu Guanzhong
brush and ink
baseline
zero