期刊文献+

如何让逆营销说服更有效?——解释水平的视角 被引量:4

How to Make Demarketing Persuasion more Effective? From the Perspective of Construal Level
原文传递
导出
摘要 逆营销的目的之一是减少过度消费与浪费。通过操纵逆营销诉求的建构水平,发现:(1)与没有任何诉求和抽象建构诉求相比,具体建构诉求能够更有效地说服具体识解倾向者展开节约行为;(2)与没有任何诉求和具体建构诉求相比,抽象建构诉求能够更有效地说服抽象识解倾向者展开节约行为;(3)具体诉求与双诉求皆可有效说服具体识解者;(4)抽象诉求与双诉求皆可有效说服抽象识解者;(5)与没有任何诉求、抽象诉求和具体诉求相比,双诉求在整体上产生最好的逆营销说服效果。研究结果既补充了解释水平理论,又为现实营销提供了可行的依据。 One of the purposes of demarketing is to reduce excessive consumption and waste.Through manipulating the construal level of demarketing appeal, this paper finds out that :(1) compared with default appeal or abstract construal appeal, the specific construal appeal can better persuade those who are construal-inclined to practice saving behaviors;(2) compared with default appeal or specific construal appeal, the abstract construal appeal can better persuade those who are abstractly construal-inclined to practice saving behaviors;(3) both specific appeal and dual appeal can effectively persuade those who are specific construal;(4) both abstract appeal and dual appeal can effectively persuade those who are abstract construal;(5) compared with default appeal, abstract appeal and specific appeal, dual appeal can produce the best effect of demarketing persuasion on the whole. Such research findings can not only supplement the construal level theory, but also provide a practical basis for the real marketing.
出处 《江西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期30-36,130,共7页 Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 宜宾学院教育科学学院项目"逆营销与说服效果--解释水平理论视角"
关键词 逆营销 面子需要 诉求建构水平 demarketing face need construal level of appeal
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Beeton S, Benfield R. Demand Control: The Case for Demarketing as a Visitor and Environmental Management Tool[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2002, 10(6): 497-513.
  • 2White K., Macdpmmell R., Dahl D. W.. It's the Mind-Set That Matters: The Role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation Behaviors [J]. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 2011, 48(3): 472-85.
  • 3Chiou H.. Think Abstractly, Smoke Less: a Brief Construal-level Intervention can Promote Serf-control Leading to Re- duced Cigarette Consumption Among Current Smokers[J]. Addiction, 2013, 108(5): 985-92.
  • 4苏凇,黄劲松.关于逆营销的效果研究:基于CLT理论的视角[J].管理世界,2013,29(11):118-129. 被引量:16
  • 5Kotler P., Levy S. J.. Demarketing Yes Demarketing [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1971, 49(6): 74-76.
  • 6Wansink B.. De-marketing Obesity[J]. 2004, (7): 84-86.
  • 7Karyy O., Traeh O.. Demarketing of Fuel and Energy Resources in Housing and Utilities Sector[J]. Biehhk Hauihajib- horo Yhibepchtety, 2014, (789): 32-8.
  • 8Trope Y., Liberman N., Wakslak C.. Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Predic- tion, Evaluation, and Behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2007, 17(2): 83-95.
  • 9Liberman N., Trope Y., Wakslak C.. Construal Level Theory and Consumer Behavior[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychol- ogy (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 2007, 17(2): 113-7.
  • 10Kim H., John D. R.. Consumer Response to Brand Extensions: Construal Level as a Moderator of the Importanee of Perceived Fit[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2008, 18(2): 116-26.

二级参考文献170

  • 1唐小飞,周庭锐,陈淑青.价格促销与D&B忠诚模式关联实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(10):121-128. 被引量:16
  • 2Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54, 27-41.
  • 3Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). "I" seek pleasures and "we" avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 33-49.
  • 4Bar-Anan Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 609-622.
  • 5Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 610-622.
  • 6Bottomley, P. A., & Holden, S. S. (2001). Do we really know how consumers evaluate brand extensions? Empirical generalizations based on secondary analysis of eight studies, Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 494-500.
  • 7Dacin, P. A., & Smith, D. C. (1994). The effect of brand portfolio characteristics on consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 31,229-42.
  • 8Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 96-100.
  • 9Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 363-381.
  • 10Fiske, S. T., & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In R. M. Sorrentino, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 167-203). New York: Guilford Press.

共引文献113

同被引文献44

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部