多元·科学·规范:美国高校学生评教制度管窥被引量：15

Pluralism, Scientificity, and Normalization: An Insight into the System of Student Evaluation of Teaching in American Colleges and Universities

下载PDF

导出

摘要美国高校学生评教已有90余年历史,评教目的由单一走向多元,评教工具形式多样、内容渐成共识,评价体系实施有序,评教数据处理规范、结果反馈合理等特点已成为学生评教工作有效实施的基石。美国高校学生评教经验启示我们:提高参与者对学生评教活动的认识;鼓励评估专家建立评教指标数据库,设计科学的学生评教量表;恰当处理造成评教偏差的潜在因素,提升评教结果的可靠性与准确度;构建高效反馈系统,建立"以评促教"的效能跟踪机制。 The SET （Student Evaluation of Teaching） system in American colleges and universities has been carried out for more than 90 years. As basis of an effective system, it is characterized by plural purposes, multiple tools with different focus, controlled data analysis, and relevant feedback. For Chinese colleges and universities, it is necessary to improve the understanding of SET by stakeholders, encourage experts in evaluation to establish database of indicators, design a scientific and relevant scales for different purposes, and deal with the potential factors out of faculty control which might effect results, so as to improve the reliability and accuracy, and last but not least, construct feedback system to trace the effectiveness of faculty development in teaching.

作者徐丹熊艳青

机构地区湖南大学教育科学研究院

出处《大学教育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期102-107,共6页 University Education Science

基金湖南省教育科学规划2012年基金项目"我国研究型大学本科生就读经验现状调查"(XJK012CGD001) 湖南省社科基金2012年项目"中美研究型大学本科生就读经验比较"(12YBA063)

关键词美国高校学生评教评教制度评教流程教学有效性 American colleges and universities student evaluation of teaching teaching evaluation system procedure of teaching evaluation teaching effectiveness

分类号 G640 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1Greenwood,G.E.et al.(1976).A study of the validity of four types of student ratings of college teaching:Assessed on a criterion of student achievement gains.Research in higher education 5: 171-178.
2Buskist, W., Sikorski, J., Buckley, T., & Saville, B. K.(2002).Elements of master teaching. The teaching of psychology:Essays in honor of Wilbert J.McKeachie and Charles L.Brewer. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum:27-33.
3Instruction Development and Effectiveness Assessment Center[EB/OL] http..//ideaedu.org/.
4Office of Educational Assessment in Washington University [EB/OL]http://www. washington, edu/ oea/services/course_eval/about, html.
5Richard A.Schwier.(1982).Design and use ol student evaluation instruments in instructional development. Journal of instructional development. 5,28-34.
6Frey,P. W. (1978). A two-dimensional analysis of student ratings of instruction.Research in higher education 9:69-91.
7Marsh,H.W.(1984).Students' evaluations of university teaching:Dimensionality reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology.76,707-754.
8Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation:Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness.San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
9Braskamp,L.A.,& Ory,J.e.(1994).Assessing faculty work : Enhancing individual and institutional performance.San Francisco :Jossey-Bass.
10Centra, J. A. (1979). self-rating of college teachers, a comparison with student ratings. Journal of education measurement 10(4):287-295.

二级参考文献14

1薛天祥,房剑森.我国高教质量评价研究的历史、现状与趋势[J].高等教育研究,1994,15(3):16-23. 被引量：18
2吴钢.建立我国高等教育评价制度的思考.高教评估,1993,(4).
3The IDEA Center. (2002) . Basic Data for the Revised IDEA System.Technical Report No.12.[EB/OL]http: //www.idea.ksu.edu/reports/tchrpt12/Doc6.htm.
4Kenneth R Bain. (1996). Student Rating and the Evaluation of Teaching: A White Paper.
5Kenneth R.Bain. (1996). Student Rating and the Evaluation of Teaching: A White Paper.
6The IDEA Center. (2002) . Basic Data for the Revised IDEA System. Technical Report No. 12. [EB/OL].http: //www.idea.ksu.edu/reports/tchrpt12/Doc6.htm.
7陈玉琨.教育评价学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2003.12-13.
8章志光.心理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001,5..
9王景英.教育评价理论与实践[M].长春:东北师大出版社,2001.
10李海宗.影响高校教学评价的主体心理因素及其调控.中国高等教育评估,1997,(4):39-39.