期刊文献+

从生成至对接与深化——于赓虞研究述评

From Generation to Docking and Deepening:An Overview of Studies on YU Geng-yu
下载PDF
导出
摘要 于赓虞研究可分为两个阶段:1923—1949年的研究多为其好友所作,在诗歌内容、艺术形式、中外影响等方面为于赓虞研究打开了通道,其中,诗歌的情感内容与艺术形式时人毁誉不一,牵涉到复杂的人事因素;1980年后的研究为全面深化期,诗歌方面在延续前一阶段研究的基础上逐渐深化,影响源由雪莱扩展至波德莱尔、《鲁拜集》、厨川白村和华兹华斯等,诗歌分期多样化,生平经历和诗论获得关注,意味着开辟了新的研究领域,研究观念和研究方法也得以更新。 YU Geng-yu' s research can be divided into two stages: the research from 1923 to 1949 was often done by his friends, who opened the channel of YU Geng-yu' s research in the poetic content, artistic form and influence at home and abroad. People of that time passed different judgments on the content and form of his poetry both positively and negatively. Some review involved complex human factors. The study after 1980 was the period of comprehensive deepening. Research on Poetry was gradually deepened based on the previous stage. Extraterritorial impact source extended from Shelley to Baudelaire, "rubayat", Kuriyagawa, Wordsworth and so on. Diversity of poetry stage, life experience of poets and poetic theory received more attention, which means that a new field of research was opened and research ideas and research method are also updated.
作者 司真真
出处 《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》 CAS 2016年第5期90-98,共9页 Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基金 河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究青年项目"李白凤 于赓虞作品整理与研究"(2016-qn-082)
关键词 于赓虞 恶魔诗人 研究述评 YU Geng-yu satanical poet research comment
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1周仿溪.赓虞近作与旧词[N].京报副刊·文学周刊,1925—09—05.
  • 2赵景深.于赓虞的晨曦之前[M]//文学讲话.上海:亚细亚书局,1927.
  • 3昭园.介绍及批评晨曦之前[N].晨报副刊,1926-10-30.
  • 4焦菊隐.我们的杂记[N].京报副刊·文学周刊,1925-04-04.
  • 5沈从文.沫沫集[M].上海:大东书局,1934.
  • 6沈从文.我们怎么样去读新诗[J].现代学生,1930(创刊号).
  • 7沈从文.论徐志摩的诗[J].现代学生,1932,2(2):1-12.
  • 8赵景深.于赓虞[M]//文人剪影.北平:北新书局,1936.
  • 9王贺.“恶魔诗人”之后--于赓虞的异域抒写及边地言行[J].中国现代文学研究丛刊,2012(3):79-91. 被引量:3
  • 10诗集两种:圣者与酒徒[J].华严,1929(创刊号).

二级参考文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部