摘要
互惠理论是近几十年行为经济学和实验经济学的主要研究内容之一,而Dufwenberg和Gneezy在2000年提出的丢包博弈的实验表明,丢包人的回报行为与捡包人放弃的外部选择权的大小并不存在正相关关系。Servatka、Vadovi(2009)和Cox等(2010)分别尝试用外部选择权的不平等和外部选择权对丢包人的凸显性来破解丢包博弈之谜,他们的实验仍然没有改变丢包人的决策行为与捡包人放弃的外部选择的不对称性,丢包博弈仍旧是个悬而未决的谜。破解丢包博弈之谜,对探究当前我国市场经济条件下企业的竞争与合作、多成员之间的团队创新行为有重要的启示意义。
The theory of reciprocity is one of main topics of behavioral economics and experimental economics in recent several decades. However, lost wallet game proposed by Dufwenberg and Gneezy in 2000 indicated that the reward behavior of wallet owner and the size of the outside option the wallet picker forgone are uncorrelated or weakly correlated. Serv^ttka and Vadovi~ （2009） and Cox et al （2010） were trying to use the inequality of outside option and the saliency of outside option to the wallet loser to shed some light on the puzzle of lost wallet game, but their experiments hasn＇t solved the asymmetry between the wallet loser＇s reward behavior y and the outside option the wallet picker forgone. Therefore, the lost wallet game is still an open puzzle.
出处
《产业经济评论》
2016年第3期106-116,共11页
Review of Industrial Economics
