期刊文献+

对不同社会距离视域下坏消息告知伦理问题的探讨 被引量:4

Discussion on the Ethical Issues of Telling Bad News in the View of Different Social Distance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从解释水平理论、心理距离、解释水平与心理距离的关系、社会距离四个方面出发,分析了解释水平理论社会距离视域下的现行知情同意履行模式,论述了保护性医疗的伦理问题,并针对此问题提出了解决办法:肯定患方参与的必要性;解决病人自主性与医患信任的关系;实现医疗决策的患者参与。 Beginning with the construal level theory, psychological distance, the relationship between construal level and psychological distance, and social distance, this paper analyzed the implementation mode of current informed consent from the perspective of social distance in the construal level theory. It discussed the ethical issues of protection medical treatment and put forward the relative solutions : affirming the necessity of the participation of the patients; solving the relationship between patients' autonomy and doctor- patient trust; and implementing patients' participation in medical decision making.
作者 孙鹤宇 尹梅
出处 《中国医学伦理学》 2016年第3期421-423,共3页 Chinese Medical Ethics
基金 黑龙江省社会科学重点规划项目<医疗体制转型与我国医患关系变革研究> 编号:14A005 四川医事卫生法制研究中心青年项目<基于解释水平理论的医患认知和决策差异研究> 编号:YF15-Q02
关键词 医疗决策 医患沟通 解释水平理论 医患信任 Medical Decision Making Doctor - patient Communication Construal Level Theory Doctor - pa- tient Trust
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Bar- Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y. The association between psychological distance and con- strual level: Evidence from an implicit association test [ J ]. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Gen- eral, 2006, 135(4):609 -622.
  • 2Trope, Y. , Liberman, N. Temporal construal[ J]. Psychological Review, 2003, 110 (3) : 403 - 421.
  • 3徐惊蛰,谢晓非.解释水平视角下的自己-他人决策差异[J].心理学报,2011,43(1):11-20. 被引量:94
  • 4Peng J, He F, Zhang Y, et al. Differences in sim- ulated doctor and patient medical decision making: a construal level perspective [ J ]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(11) :e79181.

二级参考文献27

  • 1Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 609-622.
  • 2Bonaccio, S., & Dalai, R. S. (2006). Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 127-151.
  • 3Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475--482.
  • 4Byrne, D. -(1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
  • 5Fujita, K., Henderson, M. D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17, 278-282.
  • 6Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Oxford: Wiley.
  • 7Kim, H., & John, D. R. (2008). Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 116-126.
  • 8Kray, L. J. (2000). Contingent weighting in self-other decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 82-106.
  • 9Kray, L., & Gonzalez, R. (1999). Differential weighting in choice versus advice: I'll do this, you do that. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 207-217.
  • 10Krueger, J. L. (2003). Return of the ego-self-referent information as a filter for social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003). Psychological Review, 110, 585-590.

共引文献93

同被引文献52

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部