期刊文献+

《巴黎协定》坚持的“共区原则”与国际气候治理机制的变迁 被引量:31

Paris Agreement,Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities and the Transformation of International Climate Regime
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文运用"原则与规则"的框架,分析了《巴黎协定》坚持共同但有区别的责任和各自能力原则(共区原则)的重要意义及其适用方式的新变化。共区原则是国际气候治理机制的重要构成要素,它旨在为发达国家与发展中国家规定不同的减排责任与义务,从而使得该国际机制体现出公平性与合理性的制度特征。但是各缔约方对该原则一直存在着不同的解读,并在新的国际政治、经济背景下对其涵义与适用方式产生了重大分歧。《巴黎协定》坚持共区原则在一定程度上解决了这种分歧,具有重要的科学、伦理和制度意义。同时应该注意到,《巴黎协定》在适用该原则的时候加入了动态的因素,使得该协定的规则体系呈现新的特征。但总体上,《巴黎协定》表明国际气候治理机制当前发生的变迁是该项国际治理机制内部的变迁。 Simplifying the elements of international regimes into 'principles' and 'rules',the article analyzes the significance of the Paris Agreement's adherence to the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities(CBDRRC) and the changes in the approach to apply this principle.The CBDRRC is an important element of international climate regime and defines the basic feature of global climate governance regime,that is,the fair distribution of commitments between developed and developing countries.However,there are always divergences on the interpretation and the approach to apply this principle among Parties,especially since 2007.The Paris Agreement makes it clear that it will be implemented to reflect equity and the principle of CBDRRC,in the light of different national circumstances.This settles the divergences among Parties in some sense and guarantees the equity,universality,legality and effectiveness of international climate regime.However,there are some changes in the approach to apply the principle,which add new features to the rules of the international regime.Above all,the transformation of international climate regime so far has been the change within the regime.
作者 薄燕
出处 《气候变化研究进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期243-250,共8页 Climate Change Research
基金 2015年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(15JZD035)
关键词 《巴黎协定》 共区原则 国际气候治理机制 气候谈判 Paris Agreement the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities international climate regime climate negotiation
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Krasner S D. International Regimes [M]. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 1983: 2-5.
  • 2鴻燕,高翔.原则U规则:个球氕候变化治理机制的变迁[J]. IM:界 经济 4政治,2014,12(2):45-68.
  • 3Dasgupta C. The climate change negotiations [M]// Mintzer I M, Leonard J A. Negotiating climate change: the inside story of the Rio convention. Cambridge, New York : Cambridge University Press, 1994: 134.
  • 4Bodansky D, Brunnec J, Hey E. The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  • 5Broder J M. Signs of new life as UN searches for a climate accord [Nj. New York Times, 2012.
  • 6Wei T, Yang, S, Moore J C, et al. Developed and developing world responsibilities for historical climate change and C02 mitigation [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109 (32): 12911-12915.
  • 7International Institute for Sustainable Development. Summary of the Paris Climate Change Conference OL 15 December 2015 [R/OL]. 2015 [2016-03-01 j. http://www.iisd.ca/downIoad/pdf/enbl2663e.pdf.
  • 8巢清尘,张永香,高翔,王谋.巴黎协定——全球气候治理的新起点[J].气候变化研究进展,2016,12(1):61-67. 被引量:122
  • 9桑德琳·马龙-杜波依斯,凡妮莎·理查德,彭峰(译者).国际气候变化制度的未来蓝图——从《哥本哈根协议》到《坎昆协议》[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2012,29(2):1-14. 被引量:8
  • 10《巴黎协定》,FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.l [R/OL], 2015 [2016-01-18]. http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/applicadon/pdf/ chinese_paris_agrecment.pdf.

二级参考文献40

  • 1马欣,李玉娥,何霄嘉,王文涛,刘硕,高清竹.《联合国气候变化框架公约》应对气候变化损失与危害问题谈判分析[J].气候变化研究进展,2013,9(5):357-361. 被引量:12
  • 2A Delbosc."What Should We Take Away from Cancun?"[EB/OL].(2011-01-03)[2011-02-15].http://www.cdcclimat.com/Climate-Brief-no3-What-should-we.html.
  • 3P Daillier,A Pellet,M Forteau.Droit international public[M].Paris:LGDJ,2009:400.
  • 4联合国政府间气候变化专门委员会的第二份报告.http://www.ipcc.ch/.
  • 5IPCC Third Assessment Report,Climate Change 2001:Synthesis Report-Summary for Policymakers,2001年第5页.
  • 6IPCC Fourth Assessment Report,Climate Change 2007:Synthesis Report-Summary for Policymakers,2007年第2页.
  • 7http://unfccc.int/essential_background/convention/status_of_ratification/i-tems/2631.php.
  • 8UNEP,The Emissions Gap Report.Are the Copenhagen Accord Pledges Sufficient to LimitGlobal Warming to 2°C or 1.5°C?A Preliminary Assessment,November 2010,http://www.unep.org/publications/ebooks/emissionsgapreport,last visited 16 February 2011.
  • 9H.Casella,A.Delbosc,C.de Perthuis,"Cancun:Year One of the Post-Copenhagen Era",Climate Report no.24,CDC ClimatResearch,2010,http://www.cdcclimat.com/Climate-Report-no24-Cancun-Year,512.html?lang=en,last visited 14 February 2011.
  • 10the Climate Action Tracker website,http://www.climateactiontracker.org,last visited 14 Feb-ruary 2010.

共引文献146

同被引文献403

引证文献31

二级引证文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部