期刊文献+

介于还原论与一门非还原论的本体论之间的形而上学 被引量:1

Metaphysics between Reductionism and a Non-Reductionist Ontology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 真正的二论背反本质上是模态间的(比如把运动还原为空间中静止的位置)。尽管所有二论背反都必然蕴含逻辑矛盾,但逻辑矛盾并不必然预设二论背反(悖论)。这句话的意思是说,逻辑本身有一个本体层次上的基础——正如从充足理由原则和排除二论背反原则的本质中所看到的那样——,因此只有在一种非还原论的本体论基础上才有意义。当内在批判的方法揭示了真正的二论背反时,在不同哲学立场间进行有意义的理智互动的通道就被打开了。要区分矛盾与二论背反,哲学家就必须思考一种非还原论的本体论的含义,比如避免一元论的立场。
出处 《广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2016年第4期30-48,共19页 Journal of Guangxi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
  • 相关文献

参考文献86

  • 1Metaphysics, edited by Mark Pestana, published by InTech, Janeza Trdine 9, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia, ISBN: 978-953-51-0646-3, pp.83-110, 2012.
  • 2see W. Salmon, ed., Zeno's Paradoxes, New York: Bobs-Merrill, 2001, p. 23.
  • 3W. Stegmiiller, Main Currents in Contemporary German, British and American Philosophy, Dordrecht-Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1970, p. 331.
  • 4E. W. Beth, Mathematical Thought, Dordrecht-Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1965, p.89.
  • 5see his "The Power and Limits of Reduction" in Agazzi, Volume 18, Mario Bunge, ed., Foundations and philosophy of Science Unit, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991, p. 33.
  • 6K. R. Popper, "Scientific Reduction and the Essential Incompleteness of All Science" , In: Dobzhansky, 1974, p. 269.
  • 7J. Goodfield, "Changing Strategies: A Comparison of Reductionist Attitudes in Biological and Medical Research in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries", In: Dobzhansky and Ayala, 1974, p. 86.
  • 8see D. C. Dennett, Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995, p. 80 ft.
  • 9L W. V. O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1953, p. 37 ft.
  • 10L Smythies & Koestler, ed., Beyond Reductionism, London, 1972.

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部