期刊文献+

我国混合所有制医疗机构运行状况实证分析与评价 被引量:2

Analysis and Appraisal of the Operational Status of Mixed Ownership Medical Institutions in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解混合所有制医疗机构的发展现状,为引入社会资本参与公立医院改革提供参考。方法结合我国公立医院混合所有制改革的基本情况,选择典型地区的3家混合所有制医疗机构展开案例分析,并利用TOPSIS法评价3家医院改制前后在工作量、工作效率、医疗质量和就医费用4个方面的综合效益。结果公立医院混合所有制改革有利于缓解财政压力,增加医疗服务供给,提高医院的经营管理水平,但对于综合效益的提升仅1家医院显示有积极的影响。结论混合所有制在一定程度上可以促进公立医院改革,但还需要明确和细化操作性政策,加强政策引导和运营监管。 Objective To know the current development of mixed ownership medical institutions and provide references for introducing social capital to promote public hospitals reform.Method Through combining with the review of the reform of the mixed ownership of public hospitals in China,analyzing three typical mixed ownership hospitals as case study,and further taking TOPSIS to evaluate the comprehensive effectiveness of workload,efficiency,quality and medical expense before and after the reform.Result The reform of the mixed ownership of public hospitals is beneficial to financial stress remission,increasing supply of health service and improving operational management level,but reform has positive influence on comprehensive effectiveness in 1 hospital.Conclusion To some extent,the reform of the mixed ownership of public hospitals is effectual,but government departments should clarify,refine practically policies,and strengthen political guidance and operation supervision.
出处 《中国医院管理》 北大核心 2016年第6期6-8,共3页 Chinese Hospital Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71273175) 国家卫生和计划生育委员会卫生计生政策委托课题(2015NHFC05) 上海市卫生和计划生育委员会/上海创新医学基金项目(20141203) 上海市教育委员会基金项目(13YS022) 上海申康医院发展中心研究项目(2013SKMR-02)
关键词 混合所有制 公立医院 运营 评价 mixed ownership public hospital operation evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献61

  • 1李建明,曲成毅.TOPSIS法及其在SAS软件上的实现[J].中国医院统计,2006,13(1):9-10. 被引量:19
  • 2Busse R, Nimptsch U, Mansky T. Measuring, monitoring, and managing quality in Germany' s hospitals [ J ]. Health Affairs, 2009, 28 (2) : 294-304.
  • 3Schreyogg J, Tiemann O, Busse R. Cost accounting to determine prices: how well do prices reflect costs in the German DRG-system? [ J]. Health Care Management Science, 2009, 9(3) : 269-279.
  • 4Busse R, Riesberg A. Health care systems in transition: Germany [ M ]. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2004.
  • 5Federal Statistical Office of Germany. Fachserie 12 Reihe 6. 1.1 Grunddaten der Krankenhaser und Vorsorge-oder Reha- bilitationseinrichtungen 2009 [ EB/OL ]. [ 2012-01-02 ]. www. destatis, de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Content/Publikationen/Fachveroeffentlichungen/ Gesundheit/Krankenhaeuser/GrunddatenKrankenhaeuser, temolateld = renderPrint, psml.
  • 6Pestieau P. Assessing the performance of the public sector [J]. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 2009, 80(1) : 133-161.
  • 7Eggleston K, Shen Y C, Lau J, et al. Hospital ownership and quality of care: what explains the different results [ J ]. Health Economics, 2008, 17(12) : 1345-1362.
  • 8Scheller-Kreinsen I), Geissler A, Street A, et al. Leistungsbewertung yon deutschen Krankenhaisem-Staken, Schwahen und Vergleichbarkeit der bekannten Methoden [ J ]. Gesundheitsaonomie & Qualitasmanagement, 2011, 16: 85-95.
  • 9Shen Y C, Eggleston K, Lau J, et al. Hospital ownership and financial performance: what explains the different findings in the empirical literature? [J]. Inquiry, 2007, 44 (1) : 41-68.
  • 10Jacobs R, Smith P C, Street A. Measuring efficiency in health care: analytic techniques and health policy [M]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2006.

共引文献21

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部