期刊文献+

Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety 被引量:13

Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background: Single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is an innovative approach that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of SPLS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. Methods: In total, 99 patients who underwent SPLS for benign adnexal masses between December 2013 and March 2015 were compared to a nonrandomized control group comprising 104 conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgeries that were performed during the same period. We retrospectively analyzed multiple clinical characteristics and operative outcomes of all the patients, including age, body mass index, size and pathological type of ovarian mass, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), duration of postoperative hospital stay, etc. Results: No significant difference was observed between the the pathological results between the two groups were found to two groups regarding preoperative baseline characteristics. However, be slightly different. The most common pathological type in the SPLS group was mature cystic teratoma, whereas endometrioma was more commonly seen in the control group. Otherwise, the two groups had comparable surgical outcomes, including the median operation time (51 min vs. 52 min, P = 0.909), the median decreased level of hemoglobin from preoperation to postoperation day 3 (10 g/L vs. 10 g/L, P = 0.795), and the median duration of postoperative hospital stay (3 days vs. 3 days, P = 0.168). In SPLS groups, the median EBL and the anal exsufftation time were significantly less than those of the conventional group (5 ml vs. 10 ml, P〈 0.001; 10 h vs. 22 h, P〈 0.001). Conclusions: SPLS is a feasible and safe approach for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. Further study is required to better determine whether SPLS has significant benefits compared to conventional techniques. Background: Single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is an innovative approach that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of SPLS compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. Methods: In total, 99 patients who underwent SPLS for benign adnexal masses between December 2013 and March 2015 were compared to a nonrandomized control group comprising 104 conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgeries that were performed during the same period. We retrospectively analyzed multiple clinical characteristics and operative outcomes of all the patients, including age, body mass index, size and pathological type of ovarian mass, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), duration of postoperative hospital stay, etc. Results: No significant difference was observed between the the pathological results between the two groups were found to two groups regarding preoperative baseline characteristics. However, be slightly different. The most common pathological type in the SPLS group was mature cystic teratoma, whereas endometrioma was more commonly seen in the control group. Otherwise, the two groups had comparable surgical outcomes, including the median operation time (51 min vs. 52 min, P = 0.909), the median decreased level of hemoglobin from preoperation to postoperation day 3 (10 g/L vs. 10 g/L, P = 0.795), and the median duration of postoperative hospital stay (3 days vs. 3 days, P = 0.168). In SPLS groups, the median EBL and the anal exsufftation time were significantly less than those of the conventional group (5 ml vs. 10 ml, P〈 0.001; 10 h vs. 22 h, P〈 0.001). Conclusions: SPLS is a feasible and safe approach for the treatment of benign adnexal masses. Further study is required to better determine whether SPLS has significant benefits compared to conventional techniques.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第11期1305-1310,共6页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Benign Adnexal Masses Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery Surgical Outcomes Benign Adnexal Masses Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery Surgical Outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC, Fachel JM, Furness S, Garry R, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian turnout. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;CD004751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004751.
  • 2Medeiros LR, Stein AT, Fachel J, Garry R, Furness S. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor: A systematic review and met,a-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18:387-99. doi: 10.1111/j. 1 525-1438.2007.01045.x.
  • 3Bernhardt J, Gerber B, Schober HC, Kuhler G, Ludwig K. NOTES Case report of a unidirectional flexible appendectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2008;23:547-50. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0427-3.
  • 4Rao PP, Bhagwat SM, Rane A, Rao PP. The feasibility of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A pilot study of 20 cases. HPB (Oxford) 2008;10:336-40. doi: 10.1080/13651820802276622.
  • 5Malladi P, Hungness E, Nagle A. Single access laparoscopic splenectomy. JSLS 2009;13:601-4. doi: 10.4293/108680809X12589 999538039.
  • 6Jung YW, Kim YT, Lee DW, Hwang YI, Nam EJ, Kim JH, et al. The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1686-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0830-7.
  • 7Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, Kang H, Choi CH, Lee JW, et aL Single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: A novel method with a wound retractor and a glove. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:450-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.022.
  • 8Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim C J, Park HS, Choi CH, Lee JW, et aL Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: A comparison of peri-operative outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;151:181-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.03.010.
  • 9Jung YW, Kim SW, Kim YT. Recent advances of robotic surgery and single port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. J Gynecol Oncol 2009;20:137-44. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2009.20.3.137.
  • 10Quifiones GR, Alvarado DA, Ley Ch E. Tubal ligation using Yoon's ring. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1976;40:127-36.

同被引文献73

引证文献13

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部