期刊文献+

隐喻与思维系统的有序性

Metaphors and the Order of Thinking System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一个系统的生命在于它的有序性。隐喻将一件事物的部分特征和结构映射到另一事物上,其实质就是在思维系统中搭建起了一种新的关系。这样逐次、累积性地建构着人们的知识体系。在此过程中,思维系统的组织程度、复杂性增长,向更有序的状态发展。单个隐喻中差异性和相似性的矛盾组合决定了一次思维系统有序性的增加量。思维系统赖隐喻为食,隐喻以自我毁灭、自我矛盾的形式制造一个有意义的新关系,参与到思维系统秩序的新陈代谢之中。 The life of a system lies in its order.Metaphor maps certain characteristics and structure of one thing to another,and in essence,a new relationship is set up in thinking system.People's knowledge system is successively and cumulatively constructed in this way.During this process,thinking system's organization degree and complexity grow into a more orderly state of development.The contradictory combination of differences and similarities in a metaphor determines the increase of orderliness in thinking system.Metaphor is food for thinking system.In forms of self-destruction and selfcontradiction,metaphor creates a meaningful new relationship and participates in the metabolism of thinking system.
作者 许莉
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2016年第3期530-534,共5页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 福建省教育厅社科A类一般项目(JAS150404)
关键词 隐喻 思维系统 秩序 信息 metaphor thinking system order information
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1G. Lakoff. Women,Fire and Dangerous Things[M].Chicago.. the University of Chicago Press, 1987 : 5.
  • 2李基安.原型理论视角下的离散与模糊[J].外国语,2012,35(1):36-41. 被引量:7
  • 3G. Lakoff M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1980 : 6.
  • 4M. Black. Models and Metaphors[M]. Ithaca: The Cornell University Press, 1962 : 37.
  • 5什克洛夫斯基.作为手法的艺术[M]//俄国形式主义文论选.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1989:6.
  • 6邬焜.信息科学纲领与自组织演化的复杂性[J].中国人民大学学报,2004,18(5):10-16. 被引量:4
  • 7胡壮麟.语言·认知·隐喻[J].现代外语,1997,20(4). 被引量:346
  • 8康德 邓晓芒译.纯粹理性批判[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.170-171.
  • 9Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communi- cation[J] Bell System Technical Journal, 1948(27) 379-429.
  • 10埃尔温t薛定谔.生命是什么?[M].长沙:湖南科技出版社,2007.

二级参考文献43

  • 1李基安.情态意义和情态助动词意义[J].外国语,1999,22(4):19-23. 被引量:58
  • 2Aarts,B.Conceptions of Gradience in the historyof linguistics[J].Language Sciences,2004a,(26):343-389.
  • 3Aarts,B.Modelling linguistic gradience[J].Studies in Language,2004b,(28):1-49.
  • 4Aarts,B.Conceptions of categorization in the his-tory of linguistics[J].Language Sciences,2006,(28):361-385.
  • 5Chambers,J.K.&P.Trudgill.Dialectology[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004.
  • 6Chomsky,N.Three factors in language design[J].Linguistic Inquiry,2005,(36):1-22.
  • 7Chomsky,N.Language and Mind[M].Cam-bridge:Cambridge University Press,2006.
  • 8Coates,J.The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries[M].London:Groom Helm,1983.
  • 9Frege,G.Concepts[A].B.Aarts,D.Denison,E.Keizer&G.Popova.Fuzzy Grammar[C].Ox-ford:Oxford University Press,2004:33-34.
  • 10Halliday,M.A.K.&C.Matthiessen.ConstruingExperience through Meaning[M].北京:世界图书出版公司,1999/2008.

共引文献827

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部