期刊文献+

稻田温室气体减排成本收益分析 被引量:7

Cost-benefit assessment for greenhouse gas mitigation in rice-based agriculture
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用政府间气候变化专门委员会(intergovernmental panel on climate change,IPCC)推荐方法计算稻田不同技术组合温室气体排放量和单项技术减排潜力,运用边际减排成本曲线确定区域内由基准模式向最(次)优减排模式转化的相应成本,对稻田温室气体减排不同技术组合的成本-收益进行评估,确定成本有效性减排技术组合和区域内不同减排技术组合转化的边际减排成本。研究表明:(1)稻田土壤是最大排放源,其次是氮肥直接和间接排放。优化灌溉技术、氮素来源、轮作方式以及开展秸秆还田可降低水稻种植周期温室气体排放1.52%~40.17%,最大减排潜力来自于灌溉技术与模式选择差异;(2)以浙江省台州市黄岩区为例,以"淹水灌溉+化肥+秸秆燃烧"作为基准技术组合,由基准技术组合模式转向4种"低排放"技术组合模式的影子价格为1.63~9.79元·kg^-1CO2当量,"淹水灌溉+化肥+秸秆移走(作建筑材料)"技术组合模式最具成本有效性。 This study presented a modeling tool to assess emission of greenhouse gases( GHGs) from rice-based agricultural system as affected by different mitigation technologies,as well as mitigation potential of single technology according to technical coefficients recommended by intergovernmental panel on climate change( IPCC). As there were a range of technically feasible measures to reduce agricultural GHG emissions,the present study also developed a marginal abatement cost curve( MACC) to assess their cost-effectiveness and mitigation potential in the field. It was shown that with the current farmers' practice in China,soil-borne emissions were the major source of GHGs,followed by nitrogen fertilizer application both on-and off-farm. Through improvement in water management,inorganic / organic N supply,rotation and straw returning,GHG emission could be reduced by 1. 52% to 40. 17% during the whole cropping cycle. A significant reduction of global warming potential( GWP) could be achieved by modification of water management. The present study then assessed GHG emissions and economic returns under different mitigation technologies in rice growing region. Taking Huangyan District,Taizhou City as an example,the shadow price would be 1. 63 to 9. 79 yuan·kg^-1CO2equivalent( CE) when baseline technology( continuous flooding,urea fertilization,burning of rice straw) was converted to preferable options,and the technology combinations including continuous flooding,urea fertilization and straw used as construction material exhibited the highest cost-effectiveness.
出处 《浙江农业学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期707-716,共10页 Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(11CGL057) 浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY14G030012)
关键词 稻作系统 温室气体排放 甲烷 成本-收益分析 rice-based agricultural system greenhouse gases emissions methane cost-benefit analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1SMITH P, MARTINO D, CAI Z, et al. Greenhouse gas miti- gation in agriculture [ J ]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 2008, 363 (1492) : 789 -813.
  • 2温铁军,董筱丹,石嫣.中国农业发展方向的转变和政策导向:基于国际比较研究的视角[J].中国农业信息,2011,23(2):5-8. 被引量:14
  • 3MINIHAN E S, WU Z. Economic structure and strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation [ J]. Energy Economics, 2012, 34 (1): 350-357.
  • 4MACLEOD M, MORAN D, EORY V, et al. Developing greenhouse gas marginal abatement cost curves for agricultural emissions from crops and soils in the UK[ J]. Agricultural Sys- terns, 2010, 103(4): 198-209.
  • 5WASSMANN R, PATHAK H. Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in flee-based agriculture : 11. Cost-benefit assessment for different technologies, regions and scales [ J ]. Agricultural Systems, 2007, 94 ( 3 ) : 826- 840.
  • 6CAI Z C, XING G X, SHEN G Y, et al. Measurements of CH4 and N20 emissions from rice paddies in Fengqiu, China [ J ]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 1999,45 ( 1 ) : 1 - 13.
  • 7董红敏,李玉娥,陶秀萍,彭小培,李娜,朱志平.中国农业源温室气体排放与减排技术对策[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(10):269-273. 被引量:341
  • 8张卫峰,张福锁.优化氮肥管理发展低碳经济[R].北京:全国低碳农业研讨会,2010.
  • 9米松华,黄祖辉.农业源温室气体减排技术和管理措施适用性筛选[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(21):4517-4527. 被引量:13
  • 10国家发展和改革委员会.中华人民共和国气候变化初始国家信息通报[M].北京:中国计划出版社,2004:15-20.

二级参考文献47

共引文献448

同被引文献141

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部