3Am it A, Weiner Z, Ganem N, et al. The diaghostic value of power Doppler measurements in the endometrium of women with postmenopausal bleeding. Gynecol Oncol,2000,77:243-247.
4Scoutt LM, McCarthy SM, Flynn SD, et al. Clinical stage 1 endometrial carcinoma: pitfalls in preoperative assessement withMR imagingwork in progress. Radiology, 1995,194:567-572.
5Cunha TM, Flix A, Cabral I. Preoperative assessment of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and gross visual inspection, lnt J Gynecol Cancer, 2001, II : 130-136.
6Ozdemir S, Celik C, Emlik D, et al. Assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer by transvaginal sonography, Doppler ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2009, 19 : 1085-1090.
7Manfredi R, Mirk P, Maresca G, et al. Local regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology, 2004, 231: 372-378.
8Ortashi O, Jain S, Emannuel O, et al. Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer. A prospective study of 100 cases at the Dorset Cancer Centre. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2008, 137:232-235.
9Suh DS, Kim JK, Kim KR, et al. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing myometrial invasion absence in endometrial carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2009, 88: 990 -993.
10Zaino RJ. FIGO staging of endometrial adenocareinoma : a critical review and proposal. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2009, 28 : 1-9.
