期刊文献+

TEM手术治疗直肠癌与传统Miles手术的临床效果对比 被引量:10

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经肛门内镜显微外科(TEM)手术与传统腹会阴联合直肠癌根治(Miles)手术治疗直肠癌的临床效果差异。方法:选取手术治疗的127例直肠癌患者进行回顾性分析,其中53例患者采用TEM手术方法(TEM组),74例患者采用传统Miles手术治疗(传统组),对比两组患者的围手术期指标、术后免疫功能水平及手术并发症。结果:TEM组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、导尿管留置时间、住院时间均显著低于传统组患者且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者的淋巴结清扫数目无统计学差异(P>0.05);术后TEM组患者的CD4^+、CD4^+/CD8^+及NK细胞水平均高于传统组(P<0.05);术后6个月,TEM组患者的躯体功能、角色功能、情绪功能、社会功能、整体功能均高于传统组(P<0.05),两组认知功能评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);TEM组患者的手术并发症11.32%与传统组的8.11%差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:TEM手术较传统Miles手术治疗直肠癌的优势主要为创伤小,术后恢复快,术后患者的生存质量较高,但是远期效果尚不清楚。
出处 《中国普通外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期780-784,共5页 China Journal of General Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献49

  • 1Taylan Kav,Yusuf Bayraktar.How useful is rectal endosonography in the staging of rectal cancer?[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(6):691-697. 被引量:34
  • 2林国乐,蒙家兴,邱辉忠.经肛门内镜显微手术[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(4):366-369. 被引量:41
  • 3鞠海星,李德川,徐栋,钱超文,田培林.腔内超声与螺旋CT对直肠癌术前分期的对比研究[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(6):495-497. 被引量:4
  • 4邱辉忠.经肛门内镜微创手术的临床现状[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(6):446-448. 被引量:8
  • 5丁卫星,杨平,邓建中,程龙庆,廖珊.腹腔镜下腹会阴切除术两种结肠造口方式的比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2007,10(4):326-328. 被引量:6
  • 6Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection ( laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1991, I (3) :144 - 150.
  • 7Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, et al. Laparoscopie colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg ,2012,256 ( 3 ) :462 - 468.
  • 8Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop W'C, et al. Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoseopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol,2005,6 (7) :477 - 484.
  • 9Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, et M. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2013,100(1) :75 -82.
  • 10Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, et M. Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 3 randomized controlled trims. Ann Surg,2014,259 (1):139 - 147.

共引文献66

同被引文献81

  • 1黄平,王锋,杨小冬,肇毅,高一飞,沈杰,陈贤贵,李德川,楼荣灿.Miles术后会阴缝合切口感染的防治[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2009,13(1):19-21. 被引量:11
  • 2卫生部办公厅关于抗菌药物临床应用管理有关问题的通知(卫办医政发〔2009〕38号)[J].中华人民共和国卫生部公报,2009(6):43-45. 被引量:44
  • 3Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence[J]. Br J Surg, 1982, 69(10):613-616.
  • 4Kim JH, Ahn BK, Park SJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis[J]. Korean J Gastroenterol, 2015, 65(5):273-282.
  • 5Dural AC, Keskin M, Balik E, et al. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015, 25(2):129-137.
  • 6Campa-Thompson M, Weir R, Calcetera N, et al. Pathologic processing of the total mesorectal excision[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2015, 28(1):43-52.
  • 7Martellucci J, Bergamini C, Bruscino A, et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: long-term results[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2014, 29(12):1493-1499.
  • 8Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, van der Worp E, et al. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20(7):1729-1734.
  • 9Saito N, Sarashina H, Nunomura M, et al. Clinical evaluation ofnerve-sparing surgery combined with preoperative radiotherapy inadvaneed rectal cancer patients[J]. Am J Surg, 1998, 175(4):277-282.
  • 10Havenga K, Enker WE, MacDemott K, et al. Male and female exual and urinary function after total mesorectal excision for autonomic nerve preservation for carcinoma of rectum[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1996, 182(3):495-502.

引证文献10

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部