期刊文献+

3种流感病毒检测方法的比较 被引量:10

Comparison of three methods for detection of influenza virus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对病毒分离培养法、实时荧光PCR法和鸡胚培养法3种检测流感病毒的方法和结果进行比较研究,筛选快速准确的检测方法,为流感监测与防控工作提供及时可靠的病原学依据。方法同时采用病毒分离培养法、实时荧光PCR法和鸡胚培养法对2014年10月~2015年3月牡丹江市流感监测哨点医院采集的流感样病例咽拭子样本进行检测,比较检测结果。结果实时荧光PCR法的流感病毒核酸检测阳性率为15.52%,其中169份为季节性H3N2流感病毒,73份为B型Yamagata株;病毒分离培养法的阳性率为6.29%,分离出63株季节性H3N2流感病毒,35株B型Yamagata株;鸡胚分离培养法检出率为0.64%。3种方法中,实时荧光PCR法的阳性率最高,病毒分离培养法次之,鸡胚分离培养法阳性率最低。结论实时荧光PCR法比病毒分离培养法和鸡胚培养法灵敏快捷、特异性强、敏感度高,适用于流感病毒的快速检测。 Objective To compare the efficacy of the methods of the virus isolation culture,real- time PCR and chicken embryo inoculation for detection of influenza virus in order to screen accurate and rapid influenza virus detection methods. Methods The Influenza virus from influenza- like patients between October 2014 and March 2015 were detected by using methods of the virus isolation culture,real- time PCR and chicken embryo inoculation,then the results were compared. Results The positive rate of real- time PCR was 15. 52% including 169 samples of seasonal H3N2 viruses,73 copies of B type Yamagata strain. The positive rate of isolation and culture method was 6. 29% and that of chicken embryo inoculation method was 0. 64 %. Sixty- three seasonal H3N2 strains,35 Yamagata B strains. The detection rate of real- time PCR was the highest and followed by viruses isolation and culture method,the lowest was embryo inoculation method. Conclusion Real- time PCR was more faster,high sensitivity and specificity than the virus isolation and culture and chicken embryo inoculation,so real- time PCR is more suitable for detection of influenza virus in specimens.
出处 《医学动物防制》 2016年第5期583-585,共3页 Journal of Medical Pest Control
关键词 流感病毒 实时荧光PCR法 病毒分离培养 鸡胚分离 Influenza virus Real-time PCR The virus isolation and culture Chicken embryo inoculation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献53

  • 1郭元吉,赵惠芬,王敏,刘玉华$北京友谊医院,董捷,龚明敏,安乃莉,李琼,郭俊峰,莫永凯.流感病毒相变的发现及其意义[J].中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,1996,10(2):101-103. 被引量:17
  • 2范宇红,戚凤春,惠琦,毕业,于淑燕,单彭,王慧明.近年来流感病毒抗原性变异的比较[J].中国生物制品学杂志,2006,19(2):180-181. 被引量:5
  • 3Chen KT, Chang HL, Wang ST, et al. Epidemiologic features of hand-foot-mouth disease and herpangina caused by enterovirus 71 in Taiwan, 1998-2005. Peditrice, 2007, 120(2) : e244-e252.
  • 4Tu PV, Thao NT, Perera D, et al. Epidemiologic and virologic investigation of hand, foot, and mouth disease, southern Vietnam, 2005. Emerg Infect Dis, 2007, 13(11) : 1733-1741.
  • 5Hamaguchi T, Fujisawa H, Sakai K, et al. Acute encephalitis caused by intrafamiliahransmission of enterovirus 71 in adult. Emerg Infect Dis, 2008, 14(5) : 828-830.
  • 6Tan EL, Yong LL, Quak SH, et al. Rapid detection of Enterovirus 71 by real-time Taqman RT-PCR. J Clin Virol, 2008, 42 ( 2 ) : 203-206.
  • 7Saiki R K, Gelfand D H, Stottels A, et al. Primer - directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase[ J ]. Scinece, 1988,239:487 - 491.
  • 8Nobusawa E, Nakajima K. Amino acid substitution of position 226 of the hemagglutinin molecule of influenza (H1N1) virus affects receptor binding activity but not fusion activity[J]. Virology, 1988,167:8 - 14.
  • 9Isabelle H, Yan L, Michael B, et al. Molecular evlution of influenza A/ H3N2 viruses in the provinces of Quebec(Canada) during the 1997- 2000 period[J]. Virus Rese,2001,77:89 - 96.
  • 10Krug RM, Aramini JM. Emerging antiviral targets for influenza A vir- us [J]. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2009,30(6) : 269 - 277.

共引文献106

同被引文献73

引证文献10

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部