期刊文献+

深生态学面临的三类质疑及其与自我实现概念之关系 被引量:4

Three Kinds of Criticisms Against Deep Ecology and Their Relationships with the Self- Realization Concept
原文传递
导出
摘要 深生态学面临着目前现有的理论体系尚无法很好回答的三类质疑:激进性质疑、忽视他异性质疑和理论体系模糊性质疑。这三类质疑本质上或直接或间接地都是围绕自我实现概念展开的。故而,深化自我实现概念的研究是深生态学更好回应这三类质疑的理论潜力所在。关于自我实现概念研究的一个可能的深化方向是将自我实现概念纳入当代美德伦理学框架进行研究和建构。 There are three kinds of criticisms which can't be well answered by the existing Deep Ecology theory system: radicalness criticism,the neglect of otherness criticism,and the vagueness of theory system criticism. These criticisms are essentially around the Self- Realization concept of Deep Ecology,and this is why a deeper research on the Self- Realization concept has so great significance for the development of Deep Ecology theory. In order to develop the Deep Ecology theory system and help it to answer the three kinds of criticisms mentioned above better,an appropriate research idea is to bring the Self- Realization concept of Deep Ecology into the framework of Contemporary Virtue Ethics.
作者 井琪
机构地区 北京大学哲学系
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期81-86,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 深生态学 自我实现 当代美德伦理学 Deep Ecology Self-Realization Contemporary Virtue Ethics
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Naess, A. Self Realization: An Ecological Approach to Being in the World[ C] // Sessions, G. , ed. Deep ecology for the twenty- first century. Shambhala Publications, 1995.
  • 2斯宾诺莎.伦理学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1983..
  • 3包尔生.伦理学体系[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.20.
  • 4斯宾诺莎.神学政治论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1963..
  • 5Naess, A. Freedom, Emotion and Self- Subsistence: The Structure of a Central Part of Spinozag Ethics [ M]. Oslo Press, 1975.
  • 6O?qell, J. The Varieties of Intrinsic Value [ J]. The Monist, 1992 (75).
  • 7贾丁斯.环境伦理学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002..
  • 8Passmore, J. Mang Responsibility for Nature: Ecological Problems and Western Traditions [ M ]. London : Duckworth, 1980.
  • 9哈格洛夫.环境伦理学基础[M].重庆:重庆出版社,2007:3.
  • 10Plumwood, V. Comment: Self - Realization or Man Apart? The Reed-Naess Debate [C] // Witoszek, N., Brennan, A., ed. Philosophical Dialogues Arne Naess and the Progress of Ecophiloso- phy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. , 1999.

共引文献188

同被引文献66

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部