期刊文献+

剖宫产预防性抗生素使用时机的干预研究 被引量:9

Interventional study on use time of prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探索剖宫产预防用抗菌药物的最佳时机,为降低剖宫产后感染率,合理使用抗菌药物提供研究证据。方法:纳入138例择期剖宫产患者,随机分为试验组(A)和对照组(B)。试验组切皮前0.5~2 h静脉滴注头孢硫脒2.0g,术后6 h内再静脉滴注头孢硫脒2.0g。对照组断脐后立即给予头孢硫脒,术后6 h内再静脉滴注头孢硫脒2.0g,比较2组产妇术后并发症、对新生儿的影响的差异。结果:2组患者手术时间,术中失血量,术后6、12、24、48 h体温,术后48 h白细胞、中性粒细胞,差异没有统计学意义。对照组夹闭脐带后静脉滴注头孢硫脒,抗菌药物预防时间短于试验组,P〈0.05,2组患者比较有统计学意义,但没有显示出对产妇/新生儿的影响。2组出院时均无一例发生子宫内膜炎、伤口感染、症状性尿路感染,出院后随访2周和6周也未发现患者再次感染。试验期间,5例产妇发生产褥病率,2例在试验组,3例在对照组,差异无统计学意义。NICU立即入院率、新生儿败血症发生率、新生儿败血症标本送检率,差异没有统计学意义。新生儿大便菌群失调主要表现为Ⅰ、Ⅲ度,但经统计学处理,没有显著性差异。结论:仅依据本中心的数据,足月孕择期剖宫产,不合并胎盘早剥、胎膜早破、前置胎盘等感染风险因素,未显示出预防用抗菌药物时机对产妇/新生儿的影响。 OBJECTIVE To investigate optimal time of perioperative antibiotics for cesarean section to reduce maternal/neonatal infectious morbidity,and provide evidences for rational use of antimicrobial agents.METHODS A total of 138 pregnant women were recruited and randomly allocated to two equal groups.Women in treatment group(group A)received 2 g of intravenous cefathiamidine prior to skin incision while those in control group(group B)received the drug immediately after cord clamping.Each woman received 2 g of intravenous cefathiamidine within 6h after cesarean section.Following outcome parameters were measured including maternal endometritis,wound infection,urinary tract infection,maternal postpartum fever,neonatal sepsis,submission of neonatal sepsis sample,NICU admission,and neonatal intestinal dysbacteriosis.Maternal postoperative temperature was monitored within 6,12,24 and 48 hours.Simultaneously,counts of leucocyte and neutrophil were tested within 48 h.RESULTS In 10 months,112 women received elective cesarean delivery were enrolled,57 in group A and 55 in group B.The most reason for cesarean was request from the patient.No significant difference was observed in baseline demographic characteristics between groups.During operation,estimated blood loss,maternal postoperative temperature within6,12,24 and 48 hours,and counts of leucocyte and neutrophil within48 h were similar between groups.No woman had endometritis,wound infection or urinary tract infection,and no infection occurred during follow up of 2 weeks and 6 weeks after discharge.However,two and three women had maternal postpartum fever in group A and B,respectively.No significant difference was observed in neonatal sepsis,submission of neonatal sepsis sample or NICU admission.Neonatal intestinal dysbacteriosis was mainly gradeⅠ and Ⅲ.CONCLUSION Prophylactic antibiotic administration prior to surgery or after cord clamping is probably of equal effects in reducing postoperative maternal infections after cesarean section,and shows no influence on mothers/neonates.
出处 《中国医院药学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期855-859,共5页 Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
基金 "(INRUD中国中心组高风险人群药物管理组"研究课题 中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR-TRC-11001853)
关键词 剖宫产 预防 抗菌药物 随机对照试验 cesarean section prophylaxis antibiotics random control trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Luz G, Jos6 MB, Jeremy AL, et al. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage[R]. WHO:World Health Report ,2010:18-20.
  • 2李林,曾友志,张利平,张川,谭小勇,张伶俐.剖宫产术预防性应用抗菌药物的研究进展[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2015,15(5):699-702. 被引量:11
  • 3Leth RA, Moiler JK, Thomsen RW, et al. Risk of selected postpartum infections after cesarean section compared with va- ginal birth: A five-year cohort study of 32,468 women[J]. Ac- ta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2009,88 (9) : 976-983.
  • 4Hopkins L, Smaill F. Antibiotic prophylaxis regimens and drugs for cesarean section[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007, (2).
  • 5Baaqeel H, Baaqeel tL Timing of administration of prophylactic antibiotics for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta- analysis[J]. BJOI3,2013,120 ( 6 ) : 661-669.
  • 6Costantine M, Rahman M, Ghulmiyah L, et al. Timing of perio- perative antibiotics for cesarean delivery: a meta analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008,199 (3) : 301-306.
  • 7Gibbs RS. Clinical risk factors for puerperal infection[J]. Ob- stet Gynecol, 1980,55(5 Suppl) : 178S-184S.
  • 8Webster J. Post-caesarean wound infection: a review of the risk factors[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 1988,28(3): 201 -207.
  • 9Allegaert K, van Mieghem T, Verbesseh R, et al. Cefazolin pharmacokinetics in maternal plasma and amniotic fluid during pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 200: 170. el-170. e7.
  • 10唐英春,张扣兴,吴本权,张天托,谈淑卿.头孢硫咪体外抗菌活性测定[J].中国药师,2001,4(1):46-48. 被引量:10

二级参考文献34

  • 1戴自英 汪复 等.硫咪头孢菌素的实验和临床研究[J].上海医学,1978,(9):32-32.
  • 2戴自英 刘裕昆 等.实用抗菌药学(第二版)[M].上海:科学技术出版社,1998.130.
  • 3陈新谦,金有豫,汤光.新编药物学[M].第17版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:32-33.
  • 4卫生部合理用药专家委员会.中国医师药师临床用药指南[M].第一版.重庆.重庆出版社,2009:959-60.
  • 5吴敏,范柳青,覃开羽.抗菌药物体内疗效与体外药敏试验不符的原因分析[J].抗感染药学,2007,4(3):145-147. 被引量:6
  • 6Klingel ML, Patel SV. A meta-analysis of'the effect of in- spired oxygen concentration on the incidence of surgical site infection following-cesarean section[J]. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia,2013,22(2) :104-112.
  • 7Gong SP,Guo HX,Zhou HZ,etal. Morbidity and risk factors for surgical site infection following cesarean section in Guang- dong Province, China[J]. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gy- naecology Research, 2012,38(3) :509-515.
  • 8MacOnes GA,Cleary KL,Parry S, et al. The timing of anti- biotics at cesarean: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ameri- can Journal of Perinatology, 2012,29 (4) : 273-276.
  • 9G Menderes,N AtharAli,K Aagaard,et al. Chlorhexidine al- cohol compared with povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisep sis in cesarean deliveries[J]. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012,120(5) : 1037-1044.
  • 10Gode F,Okyay RE,Saatli B,et al. Comparison of uterine ex- teriorization and in situ repair during cesarean sections[J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2012,285 (5) : 1541- 1545.

共引文献38

同被引文献78

引证文献9

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部