摘要
汪静之的新诗集《蕙的风》以"情诗"扬名于文学史,也因"情诗"引来道德争议。《蕙的风》诗案中,闻一多是站在了胡梦华一边,他不认为胡梦华所说的"《蕙的风》是不道德"的观点是错误的,闻氏对《蕙的风》的否定甚至比胡梦华更尖锐,闻氏用"诲淫"、"只诲淫而无诗"、"没有诗而只淫"等语汇评定《蕙的风》,足见他对《蕙的风》的厌恶程度。另外,闻一多基于艺术本位观念的信仰,判定《蕙的风》是"粗劣的玩艺儿"。闻一多对《蕙的风》"情诗"的批评,与胡适、朱自清、周作人、鲁迅为代表的主流批评形成了鲜明的对立。但是,由于主流批评的强势影响,人们几乎没有注意到闻一多对《蕙的风》的否定意见和对胡梦华的支持。
Wang Jingzhi as the new poet was famous for his "love poems"in the history of modern Chinese literature. But his "love poems"also attracted moral controversy. Wen Yiduo in particular raised fierce criticisms against Wang's"obscenity of a playboy,"in sharp contrast with the representative mainstream criticism. However,due to the strong influence of mainstream critics,people tend to ignore Wen' s negative opinion and support for Hu Menghua's negative comment.
出处
《首都师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期81-89,共9页
Journal of Capital Normal University:Social Science Edition