元代“带过曲”不同辨析论

Differentiation of Dai-Guo-Qu During the Yuan Dynasty

任中敏先生首先提出"带过曲"这一称谓,并对其进行了学术界说。任中敏所言重点,是针对"带过曲"创作时作家的创作心理、动机、因由而言,并非对"带过曲"一体产生、发展过程的系统描述。因此,对于"带过曲"归类,无论从文献事实,还是文体性质、自由度等方面分析,"带过"一体都应归入小令范畴。而对于"带过曲"成因分析,学界虽多有推论,皆缺乏准确而有力的学理支撑,争论难分伯仲。通过对原始文献的归类分析,在综合各家见解的客观基础上,就"带过曲"的界定与成因进行相关辨析。

The appellation of Dai-Guo-Qu is firstly put up by Ren Zhong-min,and he made a clear definition about it. Mr. Ren＇s definition is pointed to the writer＇s creative psychology,motive and reason when it was structured,rather than systematic description to the literary style about its process of birth and development. So,for the classification of Dai-Guo-Qu,whether the fact of document or the nature of the literary style,degree of freedom and so on,Dai-Guo-Qu should be classified among Xiao-Ling. For Dai-Guo-Qu＇s origin,although academic scholans have made some inferences,they all have not strong support,Which is the point this article wish to probe.