期刊文献+

基于S型曲线的模糊故障树及其应用

Fuzzy Fault Tree and Its Application Based on S Curve
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在传统模糊故障树模型综合评估中很少考虑专家可信度的影响,处理专家意见时很少考虑专家评估的可信度。文中提出基于置信度的S型曲线模糊数确定方法,引入专家权威性系数和一致性系数确定专家的置信度。运用概率偏差方法求解S型曲线的可调参数,基于可调参数和置信度来校准故障树基本事件的模糊失效概率,增加了基本事件模糊数确定的灵活性。以作战系统为例进行了实验,结果表明,针对同一基本事件各专家评估分歧较大,在各基本事件之间评估分布均匀的情况下,在未经置信处理之前各基本事件得到的最终失效概率波动比较明显,而经置信处理后的各失效概率趋于稳定,验证了改进的模糊故障树在模糊失效概率确定中结果更符合客观实际,增大了模糊故障树诊断的准确性。 Aiming at the problem of the comprehensive evaluation of the traditional fuzzy fault tree model,the reliability of the expert e- valuation is seldom considered in the process of dealing with the expert opinion. Fuzzy number determination method based on the confidence degree of S type curve is proposed,introduction of the expert' s authority coefficient and the consistency coefficient. The probability deviation method is used to get the adjustable parameters of the S type curve, and the fuzzy failure probability of the basic events for the fault tree can be calibrated based on the adjustable parameters and the confidence level. Experiments are carried out in the combat system, whose results show that the assessment of the same basic events is quite different when the assessment of the distribution of the basic events is even, the final failure probability of each basic event is more obvious, and the probability of failure probability is more stable and verified that improved fuzzy fault tree is more consistent with the objective reality, and the accuracy of the fuzzy fault tree diagnosis is in- creased.
作者 徐慧 燕雪峰
出处 《计算机技术与发展》 2016年第6期1-5,共5页 Computer Technology and Development
基金 国防科工局"十二五"重大基础科研项目(0420110005)
关键词 模糊故障树 专家置信度 可调参数 S型曲线 fuzzy fault tree expert confidence degree adjustable parameter S type curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Purba J H, Lu J, Zhang G, et al. A fuzzy reliability assessment of basic events of fault trees through qualitative data process- ing[J]. Fuzzy Sets & Systems,2014,243:50-69.
  • 2Huang H Z,Tong X,Zuo M J. Posbist fault tree analysis of co- herent syatems [ J ]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2004,84(2) :141-148.
  • 3Purba J H. Fuzzy probability on reliability study of nuclear power plant probabilistic safety assessment: a review [ J ]. Pro- gress in Nuclear Energy ,2014,76:73-80.
  • 4Hsu H M, Chen T C. Aggregation of fuzzy opinion under group decision making[ J ]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1994,79:279- 285.
  • 5Miri Lavasani S M ,Yang Z, Finlay J, et al. Fuzzy risk assess- ment of oil and gas offshore wells[ J]. Process Safety and En- vironmental Protection,2011,89:277-294.
  • 6An M. Risk assessment in railway safety management[ J]. In- ternational Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2007,14 : 45 -56.
  • 7PiUay A,Wang J. A risk ranking approach incorporating fuzzy set theory and grey theory[ J ]. Engineering Reliability & Sys- tem Safety ,2003,79( 1 ) :61-67.
  • 8Wang D, Zhang P, Chen L. Fuzzy fault tree analysis for fire and explosion of crude oil tanks [ J ]. Journal of Loss Preven- tion in the Process Industries,2013,26 (6) : 1390-1398.
  • 9何逢,燕雪峰,周勇.基于S型曲线的指标权重确定方法[J].计算机科学,2015,42(6):216-219. 被引量:4
  • 10徐晓燕,刘琴.改进的模糊故障树在农村BOT项目风险评估中的应用[J].西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,34(1):73-79. 被引量:1

二级参考文献31

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部