摘要
牟宗三认为张载之学不若明道之学圆融饱满,他不认同张载对性、心等范畴的解释,认为心之名不能"由外此而别有所合以立"。他重新解释了张载的性、心、知觉等概念,将之归为一处,得出心性是一的结论,赋予张载"心"本体意义,充分彰显了牟宗三道德形上学的理论架构。
In Mou Zongsan' s view, Zhang Zai' s theory was not so self-consistent and self-contained as Ming Dao' s.Mou did not think that Zhang Zai' s interpretations about Xing、 Xin were reasonable.He was of the opinion that the definition of Xin was not made by the combination of Xing and other things.From his new interpretation about Zhang Zai' s concepts of Xing、Xin、Intuition,Xing was equal to Xin,then Mou came to the conclusion of the oneness of Xin and Xing.Accordingly, Mou added ontological meaning to Zhang Zai' s concept of Xin.This point of view had profoundly demonstrated the theoretical framework of Mou Zongsan' s moral metaphysics.
出处
《理论界》
2016年第5期20-25,共6页
Theory Horizon