期刊文献+

论牟宗三对张载“心”的释义

Mou Zongsan's Paraphrases of the Zhang Zai's Concept of “Xin”
原文传递
导出
摘要 牟宗三认为张载之学不若明道之学圆融饱满,他不认同张载对性、心等范畴的解释,认为心之名不能"由外此而别有所合以立"。他重新解释了张载的性、心、知觉等概念,将之归为一处,得出心性是一的结论,赋予张载"心"本体意义,充分彰显了牟宗三道德形上学的理论架构。 In Mou Zongsan' s view, Zhang Zai' s theory was not so self-consistent and self-contained as Ming Dao' s.Mou did not think that Zhang Zai' s interpretations about Xing、 Xin were reasonable.He was of the opinion that the definition of Xin was not made by the combination of Xing and other things.From his new interpretation about Zhang Zai' s concepts of Xing、Xin、Intuition,Xing was equal to Xin,then Mou came to the conclusion of the oneness of Xin and Xing.Accordingly, Mou added ontological meaning to Zhang Zai' s concept of Xin.This point of view had profoundly demonstrated the theoretical framework of Mou Zongsan' s moral metaphysics.
作者 刘兆玉
出处 《理论界》 2016年第5期20-25,共6页 Theory Horizon
关键词 “心” “性” “体” “知觉” “心性是一” Xin Xing Ti Intuition the oneness of Xin and Xing
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1.张载集[M].北京:中华书局,1978..
  • 2王夫之.张子正蒙注[M].北京:中华书局,2009.
  • 3朱熹.大学或问(下).四书或问[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2001:30.
  • 4朱子语类(卷五)[M].北京:中华书局,1986:85,87,89,2867,423.
  • 5晦庵先生朱文公文集(卷四十九).朱子全书22册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:2257.

共引文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部