期刊文献+

民主化、政治发展、比较历史分析研究评述 被引量:3

The Review of Democratization,Political Development and Comparative Historical Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文对2013—015年~①中国学界在民主转型、政治发展、比较历史分析领域的研究进行了追踪和评述。由于世界范围内民主转型的失败或失效,以及东亚尤其是中国的崛起,这一课题不仅引起了国际学界的关注,而且也引起了中国学界的高度关注,发表了较多的成果。在政治发展领域尽管传统的研究不多,但从比较各国的国家治理尤其是国家兴衰的视角仍有有分量的研究,有其独到的视角。在比较历史分析领域,由于历史制度主义的引入而增强了其解释力和生命力,也使人发现它对中国模式有很强的解释力。总体来说,这三年的研究没有改变我国比较政治学界仍处于解读国外比较政治学的成果和知识积累的阶段。因此,最后介绍了几篇比较政治学的学术评论,供读者对中国比较政治学发展的理解。 In this paper,track and review the field of democratic transition,political development and comparative historical analysis in Chinese academic circle from 2013 to 2015.Because of the failure of the democratic transition in the worldwide,as well as the rise of East Asia,especially China,the subject not only cause the attention of the international academia,but also cause the academic attention in China,published more academic results.Though there are not so much traditional researches in the field of political development,the research still have its weight and unique perspective from the view of comparative national governance research,especially in the national vicissitude.The explanatory power and vitality was enhanced for the introduction of the historical institutionalism in the field of comparative historical analysis,and it also make people find it has a strong explanatory power on the China model.In general,the three years’ research has not changed the situation where our country’s academia is still in the stage of reading foreign comparative politics achievements and knowledge accumulation.As a result,finally,introducing several academic essays of comparative politics for reader’s understanding about the development of Chinese comparative politics.
作者 李路曲 李晓辉 Li Luqu;Li Xiaohui
出处 《比较政治学研究》 2016年第1期179-223,共45页 Comparative Politics Studies
关键词 民主化 政治发展 比较历史分析 评述 Democratization Political Development Comparative Historical Analysis Review
  • 相关文献

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部