摘要
福山建构历史终结论的学术努力,不仅为人们思考当下人类社会中的世界普遍史问题、人性问题等普遍性问题提供了一种历史哲学视角,而且建立起了一个学术谱系的深度背景。但福山在论述历史终结论小前提时将获得承认的欲望中承认的内容固化在主奴关系情境中的承认这一特定含义上,致使历史终结论的小前提落在历史终结论大前提的外延之外,历史终结论沦落为了一种没有自洽论证逻辑作支撑的学术论断。
In his theory of the end of history,Francis Fukuyama not only provides the historical and philosophical perspective for people to think about universal problems in the current human society,such as the problem of human nature,the universal history problem and so on,but also establishes the deep background of the academic pedigree.But in the theory of the end of history,its minor premise is off the extension of its major premise.And the theory of the end of history becomes of the academic conclusion without the logic of a self consistent argument.
出处
《比较政治学研究》
2016年第2期93-113,共21页
Comparative Politics Studies
关键词
历史终结论
人性
获得承认的欲望
the theory of the end of history
human nature
desire for recognition