期刊文献+

要素市场扭曲对中国地区经济增长的影响研究 被引量:6

A Study on the Impact of Factor Market Distortions on China's Regional Economic Growth
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章通过构建测算要素价格扭曲系数的理论框架,将经济增长率分解为要素价格扭曲、劳动增长、劳动报酬增长和技术进步偏向,利用1978-2013年中国31个省份的数据进行了测算分析。测算结果表明:大多数省份的劳动偏向型技术进步导致全要素生产率的增长率下降,并且各省份资本增长速度明显大于经济增长的速度。大部分省份的资本价格扭曲程度大于劳动,资本价格相对劳动价格越便宜,这些省份的要素价格扭曲系数越小。进一步实证分析表明,在劳动人口正增速时,要素价格扭曲、地区劳动报酬增长对地区经济增长具有抑制作用,而地区技术路径的选择却适合地区经济的发展。 This paper builds a theoretical framework to calculate factor price distortions coefficients,and decomposes econom-ic growth rate into factor price distortions,labor growth,wage growth and technical progress bias. On this basis,the paper esti-mates factor price distortions coefficients by using the data of 31 provincial-level administrative areas in China from 1978 to2013. The study results show that labor-biased technical progress will make the total factor productivity growth slow down,and the growth rate of capital is significantly higher than the growth rate of economic growth in most provinces. Capital pricedistortions are greater than labor,the lower the prices of capital are,the less the factor price distortions coefficients are in theseprovinces. The further empirical analysis shows that factor price distortions and labor return inhibit economic growth,whereasthe choice of regional technical path is suitable for regional economic development.
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期62-67,共6页 East China Economic Management
基金 "广东特支计划"青年文化英才专项资金项目(2014年度)
关键词 要素价格扭曲 技术进步偏向 全要素生产率 经济增长 factor price distortions technical progress bias TFP economic growth
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Young A. The razor’s edge : Distortions and incremental re-form in the People's Republic of China [R]. National bu-reau of economic research,2000.
  • 2Naughton B. How much can regional integration do to unifyChina’s markets? [R]. Stanford University: Center for Re-search on Economic Development and Policy Reform Work-ing Paper No.58,2000.
  • 3Skoorka B M. Measuring market distortion: internationalcomparisons, policy and competitiveness [J]. Applied Eco-nomics ,2000,32(3):253-264.
  • 4BanerjeeA’Cole S, Duflo E,et al. Remedying education: Ev-idence from two randomized experiments in India [R]. Na-tional Bureau of Economic Research,2005.
  • 5施炳展,冼国明.要素价格扭曲与中国工业企业出口行为[J].中国工业经济,2012(2):47-56. 被引量:241
  • 6Dollar D, Wei S J. Das (wasted) Kapital: firm ownershipand investment efficiency in China[R]. NBER Working Pa-per No. 13103,2007.
  • 7Vollrath D. How important are dual economy effects for ag-gregate productivity? [J]. Journal of Development Econom-ics, 2009,88(2) :325-334.
  • 8Hsieh C T, Klenow P. Misallocation and Manufacturing TFPin China and India[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2009,124(4):1403-1448.
  • 9袁鹏,杨洋.要素市场扭曲与中国经济效率[J].经济评论,2014(2):28-40. 被引量:49
  • 10聂辉华,贾瑞雪.中国制造业企业生产率与资源误置[J].世界经济,2011,34(7):27-42. 被引量:504

二级参考文献135

共引文献1498

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部