期刊文献+

引入内容商的媒体平台定价行为——基于“Y”型双边市场结构的视角 被引量:4

Research on Pricing of Media Platform by Introducing Content Providers——From the Perspective of “Y-shaped” Two-sided Market Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 内容外包已成为媒体产业日益普遍的现象,内容外包的经营模式正在改变媒体市场结构。而现有文献对引入内容商的媒体市场结构及其定价行为仍然缺乏清晰的、系统的解释,为此,需突破传统的线型双边市场结构,拓展和深化媒体产业传统双边市场模型。通过引入一个内生的内容商,建立一个"Y"型双边市场结构的模型,在媒体平台垄断和竞争两类市场结构下,分析独立的内容商对媒体平台定价行为的影响。结果表明,在媒体平台垄断的市场结构下,内容的定价与接入媒体平台的消费者数量正相关,而与内容商数量负相关;在媒体平台竞争的市场结构下,平台自身的差异化程度对其利润的影响呈U型。 Content outsourcing has become a common phenomenon in the media industry,but existing literature on introducing content providers of media market structure and pricing behavior still lacks depth research. By introducing an endogenous content provider,this paper established a 'Y shaped'two- sided market model. Under the market structure of media platform monopoly and competition,we analyze the influence of the independent content providers on the media platform pricing behavior. Results show that under the media platform monopoly market structure,content pricing is positive correlation with the consumers number of access media platform,and negative correlation with the number of content providers; Under the media platform competition market structure,the impact of differentiation degree of platform on its profits present an U-Shaped. In this paper,the model breaks through the traditional linear multi- sided markets structure,which is the expanded and deepen to the traditional media industry the bilateral market model.
出处 《产经评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期31-44,共14页 Industrial Economic Review
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目"推动经济发达地区产业转型升级的机制与政策研究"(项目编号:71333007 项目主持人:胡军) 国家软科学规划项目"海外华人社会网络推动我国高技术产业升级的机制与政策研究"(项目编号:2012GXS4B063 项目主持人:陶锋)
关键词 双边市场 媒体产业 内容商 定价行为 two-sided market media industrial content providers pricing behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献57

  • 1程贵孙,孙武军.银行卡产业运作机制及其产业规制问题研究——基于双边市场理论视角[J].国际金融研究,2006(1):39-46. 被引量:59
  • 2程贵孙,陈宏民,孙武军.双边市场视角下的平台企业行为研究[J].经济理论与经济管理,2006,26(9):55-60. 被引量:145
  • 3[1]EVANS DS.The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets[J].Yale Journal on Regulation,2003,20:325-381.
  • 4[2]ROCHET J-C,J TIROLE.Platform competition in two-sided markets[J].Journal of European Economic Association,2003,1:990-1029.
  • 5[3]ARMSTRONG M.Competition in two-sided markets[EB/OL].IDEI,2004.
  • 6[4]HAGIU A.Two-sided platforms:pricing and social efficiency[EB/OL].IDEI,2005.
  • 7[5]CAILLAUD B,B JULLIEN.Chicken & egg:competition among intermediation service providers[J].Rand Journal of Economics,2002,24:309-328.
  • 8[6]HAGIU A.Optimal pricing and commitment in two-sided markets[EB/OL].IDEI,2004.
  • 9[7]ARMSTRONG M,J WRIGHT.Two-sided markets with multi-homing exclusive contracts[EB/OL].IDEI,2004.
  • 10[8]GABSZEWICZ J J,X Y WAUTHY.Two-sided markets and price competition with multihoming[EB/OL].IDEI,2004.

共引文献162

同被引文献35

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部