期刊文献+

关于亚洲价值观的思考 被引量:1

Reflection on Asian Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文对亚洲价值观的来源、核心和内涵作了阐述。作者认为亚洲价值观漏洞颇多 ,难以自圆其说 ,东亚千差万别、文化各异 ,并没有统一的价值观 ;亚洲价值观的核心——产生于封建专制土壤之中的儒家文化与封建专制政权相生相伴、相辅相成、荣辱与共 ,其落后性和诸多恶果显而易见。用儒家文化作为自己的核心 ,恰恰暴露出亚洲价值观的落后性和欺骗性 ;亚洲价值观的倡导者在对西方文化的批判中 ,不仅无的放矢 ,击不中要害 ,而且不顾事实 ,张冠李戴 ,甚至用落后的观念去反对进步的观念。因此 。 The article elaborates on the origin, the tenet and the connotation of the Asian values. The author thinks that the Asian values have too many loopholes to reconcile with themselves.Besides,East Asian countries and their cultures differ in thousands of ways without unified value concept.The Confucian culture, the tenet of the Asian value concept, which originated in the feudal autocracy complemented the feudal autocratic power and shared honor and disgrace with it. Its backwardness and the disastrous effects are obvious. With the Confucian culture as its tenet, the Asian value concept revealed its backwardness and deceiving feature. The initiators of the Asian value concept not only failed to hit the point but also disregarded the facts in their criticism of the western culture. They even used the backward concepts to counteract the progressive ones. Therefore, the so called Asian value concept initiated by a few East Asian leaders and not accepted by the peoples of the East Asian countries will be abandoned and criticized by more and more people.
作者 郑易平
出处 《中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2001年第4期39-45,共7页 Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 亚洲价值观 儒家价值观 家庭 封建专制 儒家文化 西方文化 Asian value concept Confucian value concept family
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]何家栋.中国的道路[M].南方日报出版社,2000.
  • 2[3]何清涟.经济学与人文关怀[M].广东教育出版社,1998.
  • 3[4]启良.启良集[M].三联出版社,1994.
  • 4[6]李大钊.守常文集[M].上海北新书局,1950.
  • 5[7]启良.新儒学批判[M].三联出版社,1988.
  • 6[3]孙中山全集:第1卷[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
  • 7冯久玲.亚洲的新路[M].经济日报出版社,1998,10.80.

共引文献24

同被引文献11

  • 1刘民权;王曲.阿玛蒂亚@森:当代"经济学的良心"[N]中华读书报,2006.
  • 2张海洋.中国的多元文化与中国人的认同[M]北京:民族出版社,200639.
  • 3阿马蒂亚·森;李风华;陈昌升;袁德良.身份与暴力——命运的幻象[M]北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.
  • 4俞可平.社群主义[M]北京:中国社会科学出版社,199858.
  • 5Samuel Huntington. The Clash of Civilizations[J].Foreign Affairs,1993,(Summer).
  • 6倪世雄.当代西方国际关系理论[M]上海:复旦大学出版社,2004431.
  • 7苏小和.我们丰富的身份是如何被单一化的[OL]http:∥www.chinavalue.net/BookInfo/Comment.aspx? CommentID =34040.
  • 8Stephen Walt. Building up New Bogeymen[J].Foreign Policy,1997,(Spring).
  • 9王建娥.族际政治视野中的自治、共治和多元文化主义[J].民族研究,2009(3):1-10. 被引量:17
  • 10盛文沁.多重身份VS.单一认识——读《身份与暴力——命运的幻象》[J].社会观察,2010(3):74-75. 被引量:3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部