本土化辱虐管理、组织心理安全对员工沉默影响机理研究

The Chinese Indigenous Abusive Supervision,Organizational Psychology Safety and Employee Silence:A Mediation Analysis

结合中国文化的高语境特质,在定性研究和定量分析的基础上界定了本土化辱虐管理的概念内涵和结构测量,确定了由自尊辱虐、权益辱虐、指导辱虐和决策辱虐四个维度组成的概念结构并形成相应的测量量表;探索了组织心理安全在辱虐管理与员工沉默之间的中介作用,研究结果显示:辱虐管理对员工沉默有显著正向作用,组织心理安全在二者关系中发挥部分中介效应;打开辱虐管理和员工沉默的维度,自尊辱虐、指导辱虐、决策辱虐对员工沉默的三个维度都有正向影响,同时组织心理安全仅在决策辱虐与默许型和防御型沉默之间的中介作用不显著,而在其他路径里的中介效应均显著。

Based on Chinese high-context culture and with the qualitative and quantitative methods,we find that the connotation of the Chinese indigenous abusive supervision in nature is not hostility,but unfriendliness perceived by employees.And the concept structure of abusive supervision in China includes four factors：self-esteem abuse,rights and interests abuse,instructions abuse and decision abuse.Building on the definition and measurement scale development of the Chinese indigenous abusive supervision,we make a further research to study the relationship between the Chinese indigenous abusive supervision and employee silence and select organizational psychology safety as mediator.SPSS and Amos are used for analysis.The results are：（1）organizational psychology safety exercises a significantly partial mediation between abusive supervision and employee silence.It means that abusive supervision not only influences employee silence,but,to a great extent,plays an intermediary role through organizational psychology safety.（2）explore the relations between four dimensions of abusive supervision and three dimensions of employee silence.Mediator analysis shows that the mediator effects are different.Firstly,except rights and interests abuse,the other three dimensions of abusive supervision（self-esteem abuse,rights and interests abuse,and decision abuse）all impact positively acquiescent silence,disregardful silence,and defensive silence.Secondly,organizational psychology safety has significant mediating effect on most path analysis from dimensions of abusive supervision to dimensions of employee silence,but except the path from decision abuse to acquiescent silence and defensive silence.