期刊文献+

对新课程实施中学生评价方法的哲学思考——标准化考试与档案袋评定的整合 被引量:10

Ways of Assessing Students in New Curriculum's Implementation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 评价既可能成为课程改革的动力 ,也可能成为其实施的障碍 ,它是课程改革成败的关键。为使基础教育课程改革达到预期目的 ,必须将评价改革作为课程改革的一个重要部分 ,探索出与新课程理念相一致的评价方法。目前国外较为流行的评价学生的方法是档案袋评定 ,这种评价理念与我国的新课程理念相一致 ,它强调学生参与 ,注重学生发展。然而档案袋评定能够作为标准化考试的替代评价法吗 ?笔者从不同哲学观进行分析 ,最后得到结论 :档案袋评定和标准化考试是看似对立、实质互补的两种评价方法 。 Evaluation can be the engine of curriculum reform, or the principal impediment to its implementation. Attempts at curriculum reform are likely to be futile unless accompanied by matching assessment reform. At present,portfolio assessment is very popular in western countries,especially in the United States.This kind of assessment idea is consistent with the new curriculum idea of our country. It emphasizes students participation and pays much attention to students development. However, can portfolio assessment become the alternative of standardized testing? Having done the analysis from different paradigms,the author of this article draws the conclusion that portfolio assessment and standardized testing must be combined in students evaluation.
作者 刘淑杰
出处 《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第1期123-128,共6页 Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
关键词 学生评价方法 哲学 标准化考试 档案袋评定 课程改革 建构主义 民主主义 精英主义 portfolio assessment standardized testing curriculum reform constructivism democratism
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1David Clarke.Assessment:the engine of systemic curricular reform[J].Curriculum Studies,2000,V32,N5.
  • 2James R Birrell.Standardized testing and portfolio assessment:rethinking the debate,Reading Research and Instruction,V35.
  • 3Marlow Ediger,Portfolio:will they endure?College Student Journal,V34.

同被引文献36

引证文献10

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部