期刊文献+

来氟米特联合甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效评价 被引量:11

The clinical efficacy of leflunomide combined with methotrexate in Rheumatoid arthritis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价来氟米特联合甲氨蝶呤对类风湿关节炎的治疗效果和安全性。方法:选取2014年3月~2015年12月于我院风湿免疫科就诊的类风湿关节炎患者100例,随机均分为联合组和单纯组,联合组接受来氟米特合甲氨蝶呤治疗,单纯组只接受甲氨蝶呤单独治疗;治疗结束后比较两组临床症状改善情况,血沉、炎症相关因子改变指标等,并分析联合用药的安全性。结果:联合组临床症状和血清学指标改善情况均较单纯组明显(P〈0.05),药物副反应两组无明显差异(P〉0.05)。结论:联合运用来氟米特和甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿关节炎疗效确切安全性高,临床应用时结合患者的疾病状况使用。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of leflunomide combined with methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis.Methods:100 rheumatoid arthritis patients were collected,randomize into single group and combined group,both received methotrexate treat,while on this basis,combined group received methotrexate treat; the clinical symptoms improvement,ESR,inflammation-related factors were compared after treat,analyzed the security of combination therapy. Results:The clinical symptoms improvement and serology improved significantly in the combined group than single group(P 〈0.05); there was no difference in the adverse drug reactions(P 〈0.05). Conclusion:Leflunomide and methotrexate combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis is effective,combine with the disease condition of the patient to medicate.
出处 《北方药学》 2016年第6期25-26,共2页 Journal of North Pharmacy
关键词 类风湿关节炎 来氟米特 甲氨蝶呤 临床疗效 安全性 Rheumatoid arthritis Leflunomide Methotrexate Clinical efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献72

  • 1郑振峰,林珊.来氟米特与甲氨蝶呤治疗类风湿性关节炎的Meta分析[J].医师进修杂志,2005,28(12):12-15. 被引量:25
  • 2张玲玲,魏伟.针对类风湿关节炎分子靶点的治疗药物研究进展[J].中国药理学通报,2006,22(11):1291-1296. 被引量:17
  • 3Boyesen P, Haavardsholm EA, Ostergaard M, et al. MRI in early rheumatoid arthritis: synovitis and bone marrow oedema are inde- pendent predictors of subsequent radiographic progression [ J ]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2011,70( 1) :176-179.
  • 4Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW. Rheumatoid arthritis [ J]. Lan- cet, 2010, 376:1094-1108.
  • 5Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria:an American College of Rheumatology/Europe- an League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative [ J ]. Arthritis Rheum, 2010, 62(9) :2569-2581.
  • 6Cohen S, Emery P. The American College of Rheumatology/Europe- an League Against Rheumatism Criteria for the Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis:A Game Changer[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2010, 62(9) :2592-2594.
  • 7Van der Linden MP, Knevel R, Huizinga TW, et al. Classification of rheumatoid arthritis-comparison of the 1987 ACR and 2010 ACR/ EULAR criteria[ J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2011,63 ( 1 ) :37-42.
  • 8Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, et al. Treating rheumatoid ar- thritis to target : recommendations of an international task force [ J ]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010,69(4) :631-637.
  • 9Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommenda- tions for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [ J ]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010,69(6) :964-975.
  • 10O'Dell H,Grigolo B,Borzi R M,et al.Serum copper/zinc superoxide dismutase levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J].Int J Clin Res,1999,26(4):245.

共引文献134

同被引文献78

引证文献11

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部