摘要
《海商法》第42条第3款对何为托运人进行了定义,由这项条款可知我国的托运人有两类,这项规定在海运实践中具有积极意义。但第42条的定义会致使在FOB条件下的买卖双方都为托运人,可见定义在两者作为托运人的称谓未予区分,且此两类托运人对承运人是否承担相同的权利义务也未予清晰说明。因此,第42条关于托运人的定义在实践中存在着问题,需要对其进一步完善。文章通过对我国《海商法》与国内外关于托运人的规定进行比较,从而提出完善的建议。
The definition of shipper is stipulated in article 42（ clause 3） in＂Maritime Law＂. According to this clause,there are two kinds of shippers in China. Since there is no definite division for the two terms,it is not clear whether the two kinds of shippers hold equal right and obligations to the carrier. Therefore,it is argued here that the 42 nd article may cause problems in practice. Some suggestions for improvement are proposed by comparing the regulations in ＂China Maritime Law＂and corresponding laws in foreign countries.
出处
《哈尔滨学院学报》
2016年第6期63-66,共4页
Journal of Harbin University
