期刊文献+

Numerical estimation of choice of the regularization parameter for NMR T2 inversion 被引量:2

Numerical estimation of choice of the regularization parameter for NMR T_2 inversion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Nuclear Magnetic inversion is the basis of NMR Resonance (NMR) T2 logging interpretation. The regularization parameter selection of the penalty term directly influences the NMR T2 inversion result. We implemented both norm smoothing and curvature smoothing methods for NMR T2 inversion, and compared the inversion results with respect to the optimal regular- ization parameters ((Xopt) which were selected by the dis- crepancy principle (DP), generalized cross-validation (GCV), S-curve, L-curve, and the slope of L-curve methods, respectively. The numerical results indicate that the DP method can lead to an oscillating or oversmoothed solution which is caused by an inaccurately estimated noise level. The (Xopt selected by the L-curve method is occa- sionally small or large which causes an undersmoothed or oversmoothed T2 distribution. The inversion results from GCV, S-curve and the slope of L-curve methods show satisfying inversion results. The slope of the L-curve method with less computation is more suitable for NMR T2 inversion. The inverted T2 distribution from norm smoothing is better than that from curvature smoothing when the noise level is high. Nuclear Magnetic inversion is the basis of NMR Resonance (NMR) T2 logging interpretation. The regularization parameter selection of the penalty term directly influences the NMR T2 inversion result. We implemented both norm smoothing and curvature smoothing methods for NMR T2 inversion, and compared the inversion results with respect to the optimal regular- ization parameters ((Xopt) which were selected by the dis- crepancy principle (DP), generalized cross-validation (GCV), S-curve, L-curve, and the slope of L-curve methods, respectively. The numerical results indicate that the DP method can lead to an oscillating or oversmoothed solution which is caused by an inaccurately estimated noise level. The (Xopt selected by the L-curve method is occa- sionally small or large which causes an undersmoothed or oversmoothed T2 distribution. The inversion results from GCV, S-curve and the slope of L-curve methods show satisfying inversion results. The slope of the L-curve method with less computation is more suitable for NMR T2 inversion. The inverted T2 distribution from norm smoothing is better than that from curvature smoothing when the noise level is high.
出处 《Petroleum Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2016年第2期237-246,共10页 石油科学(英文版)
基金 funded by Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.(PT45371) the National Natural Science Foundation of China-China National Petroleum Corporation Petrochemical Engineering United Fund(U1262114) the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41272163)
关键词 NMR T2 inversion Tikhonov regularizationVariable substitution Levenberg-Marquardt method Regularization parameter selection NMR T2 inversion Tikhonov regularizationVariable substitution Levenberg-Marquardt method Regularization parameter selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Borgia GC, Brown RJS, Fantazzini P. Uniform-penalty inversion of multiexponential decay data. J Magn Reson. 1998; 132(1 ):65-77.
  • 2Borgia GC, Brown RJS, Fantazzini P. Uniform-penalty inversion of multiexponential decay data II. Data spacing, T2 data, systematic data errors, and diagnostics. J Magn Reson. 2000; 147(2):273-85.
  • 3Butler JP, Reeds JA, Dawson SV. Estimating solutions of first kind integral equations with nonnegative constraints and optimal smoothing. SIAM J Numer Anal. 1981;18(3):381-97.
  • 4Castellanos JL, G6mez S, Guerra V. The triangle method for finding the comer of the L-curve. Appl Numer Math. 2002;43(4):359-73.
  • 5Dunn KJ, LaTorraca GA. The inversion of NMR log data sets with different measurement errors.* J Magn Resort. 1999; 140( 1 ): 153-6 I.
  • 6Dunn KJ, LaTorraca GA, Warner JL, et al. On the calculation and interpretation of NMR relaxation time distributions. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers. 1994.
  • 7Ge X, Wang H, Fan Y, et al. Joint inversion of TI-T2 spectrum combining the iterative truncated singular value decomposition and the parallel particle swarm optimization algorithms. Comput Phys Commun. 2016;198:59-70.
  • 8Golub GH, Heath M, Wahba G. Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics. 1979;21(2):215-23.
  • 9Guerra V, Hernandez V. Numerical aspects in locating the corner of the L-curve. In: Approximation, optimization and mathematical economics. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag; 2001. p. 121-31.
  • 10Hansen PC. Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve. SIAM Rev. 1992;34(4):561-80.

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部