Influence of coalescence parameters on the production of protons and Helium-3 fragments

The time evolution of protons and 3He fragments from Au＋Au/Pb＋Pb reactions at 0.25, 2, and 20 GeV/nucleon is investigated with the potential version of the Ultrarelativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics （UrQMD） model combined with the traditional coalescence afterburner. In the coalescence process, the relative distance R0 and relative momentum P0 are surveyed in the range of 3-4 fm and 0.25-0.35 GeV/c, respectively. For both clusters, a strong reversed correlation between R0 and Po is seen and it is time-dependent as well. For protons, the accepted （R0, P0） bands lie in the time interval 30-60 fm/c, while for 3He, a longer time evolution （at about 60-90 fm/c） is needed. Otherwise, much smaller R0 and P0 values should be chosen. If we further look at the rapidity distributions from both central and semi-central collisions, it is found that the accepted [tout, （R0, P0）] assemble can provide consistent results for proton yield and collective flows especially at mid-rapdities, while for 3He, the consistency is destroyed at both middle and projectile-target rapidities.

The time evolution of protons and 3He fragments from Au+Au/Pb+Pb reactions at 0.25, 2, and 20 Ge V/nucleon is investigated with the potential version of the Ultrarelativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics（Ur QMD） model combined with the traditional coalescence afterburner. In the coalescence process, the relative distance R0 and relative momentum P0 are surveyed in the range of 3-4 fm and 0.25-0.35 Ge V/c, respectively. For both clusters, a strong reversed correlation between R0 and P0is seen and it is time-dependent as well. For protons, the accepted（R0, P0） bands lie in the time interval 30-60 fm/c, while for 3He, a longer time evolution（at about 60-90 fm/c） is needed. Otherwise, much smaller R0 and P0values should be chosen. If we further look at the rapidity distributions from both central and semi-central collisions, it is found that the accepted [tcut,（R0, P0）] assemble can provide consistent results for proton yield and collective flows especially at mid-rapdities, while for 3He, the consistency is destroyed at both middle and projectile-target rapidities.