期刊文献+

评价理论介入视角下的反恐语篇否认资源分析 被引量:9

An Analysis of Disclaim Resources in the Counterterrorism Discourses from the Perspective of Engagement System of Appraisal Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自9·11事件发生以来,反恐成为世界关注的焦点。反恐语篇中蕴含着大量的否认资源,能有效地收缩语篇对话空间,维护声源立场的权威性。借助语料库工具UAM Corpus Tool 3和AntConc 3.4.1,从评价理论的介入视角对美国反恐局发布的反恐语篇进行分析研究可以发现,反恐语篇中否认资源主要通过具有比较和反对意义的词汇手段实现,包括否定资源和反预期资源,呈现显隐特征和强弱特征。否认资源的使用塑造了积极的美国形象,阐释了反恐行动的合理性,促进了国际反恐合作的开展。本研究丰富了介入系统的分析框架,有助于加深人们对反恐语篇和否认资源的理解。 Counterterrorism has been attached worldwide attention since 9/11 events in 2001.Abundant disclaim resources are employed in the counterterrorism discourses to contract the dialogic space and guarantee the voice authority.With the aid of UAM Corpus Tool 3and AntConc 3.4.1,this study investigates the counterterrorism discourses released by U.S.Bureau of Counterterrorism in light of Engagement System within Appraisal Theory.It can be found that the disclaim resources in the counterterrorism discourses are mainly realized by lexical devices,which can be further divided into Deny and Counter with explicit/implicit and strong/weak features.The application of disclaim resources is beneficial to create a positive image of the Unite States,clarify the rationality of counterterrorism activities and promote the international counterterrorism cooperation.This study enriches the framework of Engagement System and helps people obtain a better understanding of the counterterrorism discourses as well as disclaims resources.
作者 狄艳华 柳锦
出处 《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期125-130,共6页 Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金一般项目(12BYY008) 吉林省社科基金项目(外语专项Ⅱ)(2014WY34)
关键词 反恐 介入系统 否认资源 类型 特征 功能 Counterterrorism Engagement Disclaim Types Features Functions
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Hood,S.The Persuasive Power of Prosodies:Radiating Values in Academic Writing[J].Journal of English for Academic Purpose,2006(5).
  • 2Martin,J.R.&P.R.R.White.The Language of Evaluation:Appraisal in English[M].London/New York:Palgrave/Macmillan,2005.
  • 3袁传有.警察讯问语言的人际意义——评价理论之“介入系统”视角[J].现代外语,2008,31(2):141-149. 被引量:45
  • 4Jackson,R.Writing the War on Terrorism:Language,Politics and Counter-Terrorism[M].Manchester:Manchester University Press,2005.
  • 5Hodge,J.&G.Rose.How Did This Happen?Terrorism and the New War[M].Oxford:Public Affairs,2001.
  • 6Sherman,D.J.&T.Nardin.Terror,Culture,Politics:Rethinking 9/11[M].Bloomington:Indiana University Press,2006.
  • 7Bhatia,A.TheDiscourse of Terrorism[J].Journal of Pragmatics,2009(41).
  • 8Bartolucci,V.&G.Giorgio.Terrorism,System Thinking and Critical Discourse Analysis[J].Systems Research and Behavioral Science,2015(32).
  • 9Silberstein,S.War of Words[M].London:Routledge,2002.
  • 10Aitchison,J.The Word Weavers:Newshounds and Wordsmiths[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007.

二级参考文献53

共引文献202

同被引文献63

引证文献9

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部