摘要
《物权法》的善意取得制度与《合同法》的无权处分合同效力规则之间具有一定逻辑关系。同时最高法于2012年颁布的《买卖合同司法解释》第3条被视为对无权处分合同规则的补充或者特别规定。然有学者认为司法解释与原无权处分合同效力规则有一定冲突。厘清三者之间的逻辑关系不仅有利于案件裁决,更加是为了法律条文的顺畅。本文试图从"无权处分"一词界定出发,进而分析三个条文的逻辑关系。
The bona fide acquisition of Real Law has explicit logical relation to the effect of unauthorized conduct in Contract Law. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court issued Article 3 of the Interpretation Act [ 2012]8, which is seen as special regulations of the unauthorized conduct. But some-people considers the two have conflicts themselves. Analysis the logical relation of them will be good for the judicial practices and also will streamlining the legal. This paper defines the ＂unauthorized conduct＂ and then Analysis the logical relation of them.
出处
《特区经济》
2016年第5期107-109,共3页
Special Zone Economy
基金
浙江财经大学东方学院2013年一般课题
关键词
善意取得
无权处分
合同效力
逻辑关系
the bona fide acquisition
the unauthorized conduct
the effect of contract
logical relation
