期刊文献+

中药熏洗在肛瘘患者经挂线引流术后的临床应用 被引量:17

A Study on the Fumigation of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Anal Fistula Seton Drainage after Operation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨中药熏洗在肛瘘患者经挂线引流术后的临床应用效果。方法:收集我院收治的70例肛瘘挂线引流术后患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组35例,患者均行肛瘘经挂线引流术,术后对照组给予常规护理治疗,实验组患者给予自拟熏洗方进行中药熏洗。治疗结束后,比较两组患者的疼痛持续时间、恢复时间、创面愈合速度、症状评分并发症发生率以及复发率。结果:与治疗前相比,两组患者治疗后的症状评分均显著下降(P<0.05),而实验组患者治疗后的症状评分、疼痛持续时间、恢复时间、并发症发生率以及复发率明显低于对照组(P<0.05),创面愈合速度显著快于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:中药熏洗能够有效促进肛瘘患者经挂线引流术后恢复并减少复发,且安全性较高。 Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of fumigation with traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of the patients with anal fistula seton drainage after operation. Methods: 70 patients with anal fistula seton drainage after operation from our hospital were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group, 35 cases in each group. All the patients underwent anal fistula by the hanging line drainage. After surgery, the control group was given routine nursing care and treatment, while patients in the experimental group were given self fumigation for fumigation of Chinese medicine. At the end of treatment, the pain duration, recovery time, wound healing rate, symptom score complication rate and recurrence rate were detected and compared. Results: Compared with before treatment, the symptom scores of both groups were significantly decreased(P〈0.05). Compared with the control group, the symptom score, duration of pain, recovery time, incidence of complications, and recurrence rate of experimental group after treatment were obviously lower than those of the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion: Chinese herb fumigation washing could significantly promote the recovery of anal fistula seton drainage after operation and had high safety.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2016年第17期3376-3378,3397,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基金 湖北省自然科学基金项目(LY13H290002)
关键词 中药熏洗 肛瘘挂线术 临床疗效 Herbal Fumigation Anal fistula Seton Clinical curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献37

  • 1安阿碉.肛肠病学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社.2版.2005:214-492.
  • 2E. E. Collins,J. N. Lund.A review of chronic anal fissure management[J].Techniques in Coloproctology.2007(3)
  • 3Dr. Yik-Hong Ho,Wai-Kit Cheong,C. Tsang,Jean Ho,K. -W. Eu,C. -L. Tang,F. Seow-Choen.Stapled hemorrhoidectomy—cost and effectiveness. randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2000(12)
  • 4Mario Pescatori M.D.Closedvs. open hemorrhoidectomy: Associated sphincterotomy and postoperative bleeding[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2000(8)
  • 5Gunnar Arbman M.D., Ph.D.,Hans Krook M.D.,Staffan Haapaniemi M.D.Closedvs. open hemorrhoidectomy—Is there any difference?[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2000(1)
  • 6Dr. Wai-lun Law,Kin-wah Chu.Triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.1999(3)
  • 7Helen M. MacRae M.D., F.R.C.S.C,Robin S. McLeod M.D., F.R.C.S.C.Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.1995(7)
  • 8Dr. Allis.Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.1987(1)
  • 9Mehigan B J,Monson J R T,Hartley J E.Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial[].The Lancet.2000
  • 10Rowsell M,Bello M,Hemingway D M.Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial[].The Lancet.2000

共引文献89

同被引文献133

引证文献17

二级引证文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部