期刊文献+

我们缘何“不知道”——论“言语失效”的成因

On Reasons of the Failures of Words
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文所谓"不知道",乃"言语失效",其源于"知"与"道"的不对称。"不知道"可理解为"不知如何说"或"不知天地之大道",故对其研究宜采用语言学与哲学双重进路。基于此,本文探索了"不知道"的三种形式("说不出"、"说不尽"、"说不得")之成因,归纳为七条:语言具有"自反性",语、默互为背景,言说带有视角,逻辑形式无法自指,私人经验与公共经验不对称,形而上世界超越于现实世界,逻辑铁律不可破。 The failures of words stem from the asymmetry of knowing and saying, which can be categorized into three forms : unspeakability, inexhaustibility and unreportability. In Chinese, we call the failures of words "bu zhi dao". As "dao" means both saying and the highest metaphysical being in Chinese, "bu zhi dao" ( literally translated as "not know saying" or "not know the dao" ) has both linguistic and philosophical dimensions. Setting out from both dimensions, we conclude the reasons of the three forms of the failures of words as the following seven points : 1 ) Human language is self-reflective ; 2 ) Word and si- lence rely on each other as background; 3) Speaking contains a visual angle; 4) Language can never refer to its own logical form; 5 ) There is always a gap between private and public experiences; 6) Language as a mirror-image of the reality doesn' t work in the metaphysical world; 7) Language is fettered by the unbreakable law of logic.
作者 杨晓波
出处 《西安外国语大学学报》 CSSCI 2016年第2期19-22,共4页 Journal of Xi’an International Studies University
基金 浙江理工大学科研启动基金项目"维特根斯坦哲学与波兰尼默会认识论视域下先秦语言哲学研究与译注"(项目编号:13112185-Y)的部分成果
关键词 言语失效 “道” 不可道 failures of words Dao ineffability
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献28

  • 1钱冠连.论工具性语言扩展式——西方语言哲学研究之八[J].语言科学,2003,2(3):23-33. 被引量:9
  • 2梁瑞清.“说不出”及其现象意义——西方语言哲学新问题研究系列之二[J].外语学刊,2006(3):20-25. 被引量:7
  • 3何兆熊.语用学文献选读[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2005:54.
  • 4钱冠连.语言:人类最后的家园[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005..
  • 5钱钟书.管锥编[M].北京:中华书局,1994..
  • 6Davidson, D. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
  • 7Jackson, F. Epiphenomenal Qualia [A]. In W. G. Lycan (Ed.), Mind and Cognition: An Anthology (2nd ed.)[C]. Malden, Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
  • 8Jakab, Z. Ineffability of Qualia: A Straightforward Naturalistic Explanation [J]. Consciousness and Cognition 9(3), 2000:329-351.
  • 9Katz, J. J. Effability and Translation [A]. In F. G. a. M. Guenthner- Reutter (Ed.), Meaning and Translation (pp. 209-220) [C]. London: Duckworth, 1978.
  • 10Kukla, A. Ineffability and Philosophy [M]. London, New York: Routledge, 2005.

共引文献142

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部