略论国际民商事争议解决机制中的法学方法问题——兼对国际法学方法论课程的检思

The Analysis of Legal Methodology in Foreign——Related Civil Litigation and Commercial Arbitration

国际民商事争议解决比裁判国内案件需要更高超的法律技术与更精炼的法律方法,因而在某种程度上代表着一国民商事裁判技术的制高点。近年来,与国际争议解决息息相关的国际私法领域出现了实践困境,面临着被沦为纯粹文字游戏的危险,而其问题症结在于对法学方法的认知与适用缺位。国际民商事裁判中奉行特定的法效果归属的司法三段论,在识别阶段受制于"诠释学循环"的约束,冲突规范的确定与准据法的解释属于典型的"双重找法",准确运用法律选择中多维度的选法方法需解决目标定位问题。实证观念的重视对国际私法研究生人才培养与方法论课程设计至关重要。

It needs more sophisticated legal techniques and more refined legal methodology in the dispute resolution procedure of international civil and commercial disputes than domestic cases. Recently,there existed some practical plights in the field of private international law,which is closely interrelated to international disputes resolution,and it is faced with the danger to descend to pure jeu de mots whose crucial reason is the misunderstanding of judgment methods. The International litigation and arbitration obey the judicial syllogism,the judges are restricted by the hermeneutic circle during the characterization period and the determination and application of conflict rules can be attributed to the double find law system. Emphasis on the empirical value is vital to the talent training and curriculum design among the private international law postgraduates group.