论刑法规范的司法逻辑结构 以四维论取代二元论的尝试

On the Judicial Logic Structure of Criminal Norms An Attempt to Substitute the Dualism with the Four-dimensional Theory

司法逻辑观念是一种立体思维,它在刑法学思维中架构起刑事法庭,而二元论对此无能为力。在刑法规范观上面,基于司法逻辑的四维论力图超越二元论,为此提倡原则一规则一标准的综合性规范观念。建基于二元论和唯规则论的刑法学十分漠视法庭旁听者,对行为规范的性质和内容及其个体主义呈现方式都缺乏认识。在司法逻辑下,应区分追诉规范与辩护规范,并在这种框架下理解法益与规范、构成要件与定罪情节。以行为规范为背景、以上述区分为前提的裁判规范,具有中立性和裁量性。刑法学视域中的法官不应被视为无个性的"自动售货机"。

Being a kind of stereoscopic thinking, the Judicial Logic concept constructs a structure of criminal court; in contrast the Dualism cannot do anything. According to the Judicial Logic, the criminal norms concept takes on a four--dimensional structure. In order to overcome the Dualism, we should ad- vocate a comprehensive norms concept comprising principles--rules--standards. Based on the Dualism and Doctrine of Rules Only, the traditional criminal law completely ignores the bystanders in the court, as well as the nature and alism presentation mode content of conduct norms. Moreover, there is little cognition about its individu- in the traditional criminal law. In terms of the Judicial Logic, it is necessary to distinguish the prosecution norms and defense norms. Only in this frame can the legal interest and norms, constitutive requirements and conviction plots be understood. Against a background of conduct norms and above--mentioned distinction, the adjudication norms will possess a neutral feature and a dis- cretional feature. In the process of studying criminal law, judges cannot be deemed as non--individual au- tomatic vending machines.