期刊文献+

经Wiltse肌间隙入路椎弓根内固定术治疗老年胸腰椎骨折效果评价 被引量:9

Evaluation of pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures through Wiltse paraspinal approach in the elderly
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价经Wiltse肌间隙入路椎弓根内固定术治疗老年胸腰椎骨折的临床效果。方法选取2012年8月~2015年3月诊断为胸腰椎骨折的老年患者68例作为研究对象。根据手术方法的不同,将患者分为观察组和对照组,每组各34例。观察组男性21例,女性13例;平均年龄(54.3±8.4)岁。对照组男性20例,女性14例;平均年龄(52.8±9.1)岁。观察组经Wiltse肌间隙入路,对照组经后路入路。比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后康复时间、Cobb’s角、椎体前缘高度以及疼痛视觉摸拟量表(VAS)评分、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分。结果观察组各项手术指标优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);两组术后的Cobb’s角和椎体前缘高度较术前均有明显改善,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05),但术后两组组间比较无统计学差异(P〉0.05);两组术后VAS评分及JOA评分较术前均有改善,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05),且观察组患者术后的VAS评分(3.21±0.62)分优于对照组患者的(4.83±0.86)分;其术后的JOA评分(19.3±8.3)分也优于对照组的(14.3±7.2)分。结论经Wiltse肌间隙入路椎弓根内固定术治疗老年胸腰椎骨折具有较好的效果,患者术后疼痛减轻,恢复良好,值得临床推广。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures in the elderly through Wiltse paraspinal approach. Methods From Aug. 2012 to Mar. 2015,68 elderly patients with thoracolumbar fractures were treated with pedicle screw fixation. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty-four patients were treated through the Wiltse paraspinal approach [observation group,21 were male and 13 were female with an awerage of( 54. 3 ± 8. 4) years]and the other 34 patients were treated through traditional approach[control group,20 were male and 14 were female with an average of( 52. 8 ± 9. 1)years]. The two groups were compared in such parameters as operative time,blood loss,drainage volume,postoperative VAS score,Cobb's angle and postoperative JOA score. Results Operative time,peri-operative blood loss volume,postoperative drainage volume and hospital stay in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group( P 0. 05). Postoperative anterior border of vertebral body height and Cobb's angle were significantly improved in the two groups( P 0. 05),but there was no significant difference in degree of improvement between the two groups( P 0. 05). The postoperative VAS score and JOA scores were improved compared with preoperatively,and VAS and JOA score in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group,and the difference was significant( P 0. 05). Conclusion Pedicle screw fixation combined with transpedicular interbody bone grafting through Wiltse paraspinal approach is an effective method in treating thoracolumbar fractures. Compared with traditional approaches,it has more advantages such as less myalgia resulting from paraspinal muscle dissection,less intraoperative injuries,and shorter recovery time. It is worth wide clinical application.
出处 《创伤外科杂志》 2016年第6期338-341,共4页 Journal of Traumatic Surgery
关键词 胸腰椎骨折 肌间隙入路 椎弓根 内固定 老年 thoracolumbar fractures paraspinal approach pedicle internal fixation elderly
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献41

  • 1王健,方红光,Markku Kankaanpaa.基于表面肌电信号变化的慢性下背痛诊断和运动疗效评价[J].航天医学与医学工程,2005,18(4):287-292. 被引量:33
  • 2袁强,田伟,张贵林,刘波,行勇刚,李勤,胡临,李志宇.骨折椎垂直应力螺钉在胸腰椎骨折中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(4):217-222. 被引量:306
  • 3魏富鑫,刘少喻,赵卫东,于滨生,李浩淼,陈柏龄,梁春祥.胸腰椎爆裂性骨折伤椎固定的生物力学研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(9):857-860. 被引量:44
  • 4Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain [ J] . Lancet, 1974, 2 (7889) : 1127-1131.
  • 5Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verifica- tion of its reliability:The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Commit- tee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association [ J]. J Orthop Sci, 2007, 12(6) :526-532.
  • 6Wihse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1968, 50(5) :919-926.
  • 7Olivier E, Beldame J, Ould Slimane M, et al. Comparison between one midline cutaneous incision and two lateral incisions in the lunrbar paraspinal approach by Wihse: a cadaver study [ J ]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2006, 28(5) :494-497.
  • 8Wihse LL, Spencer CW. New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1988, 13 (6) :696-706.
  • 9Warren A, Prasad V, Thomas M. Pre-operative planning when using the Wihse approach to the lumbar spine[J]. Ann R Coil Surg Engl, 2010, 92(1 ) :74-75.
  • 10Vialle R, Wicart P, Drain O, et al. The Wihse paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine revisited: an anatomic study [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 445: 175-180.

共引文献103

同被引文献54

引证文献9

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部