期刊文献+

高被引学者论文跨学科特征分析——以经济与商业领域为例 被引量:14

Cross- discipline analysis on papers of highly cited researchers:A case study on economics and business field
原文传递
导出
摘要 高被引学者论文代表高质量的科研成果,可用来衡量全球重要的科技发展变化,反映一个国家、机构或学者的科研水平和创新影响力。近年来,国内外许多机构或学者均对高被引学者及其发表的论文予以重点关注,而分析高被引学者论文的跨学科特征将有助于引领其他学者形成新思路和新见解。基于此,本文以2014年经济与商业领域高被引学者为考察对象,以其论文所属Web of Science Category为学科衡量依据,通过高被引学者所发表论文的学科集成化指数、学科专业化指数和学科扩散化指数,系统评估了高被引学者论文的学科分布及其集成和扩散特征。研究有助于把握高被引学者论文的跨学科程度,以期为其他学者开展高水平研究提供参考借鉴。 Highly cited researchers' articles can effectively indicate research outcomes with high quality that represent a country's scientific research level and innovation influence of different countries,organizations,and individuals. These articles can measure the global technology development. In recent years,many domestic and foreign institutions and scholars have been focusing on the highly cited researchers and their papers. Interdisciplinary research on highly cited researchers' articles can lead other scholars to form new ideas and new insights. This paper evaluates the breadth and distribution of the researchers' articles based on the list of highly cited researchers in economic and business field in 2014. By constructing science overlay map along with integration score,specialization score and diffusion score based on Web of Science category of the journals on which articles published,this paper analyzes the related subjects of citing articles and gets the subject cross- discipline characteristics. The results of the paper can provide reference for other scholars to reach higher level research.
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期807-813,共7页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71373019) 国防科技情报项目(JSJC201403)
关键词 高被引学者 学科集成化指数 学科专业化指数 学科扩散化指数 跨学科分析 经济与商业 highly cited researchers specialization score integration score diffusion score cross-discipline analysis economic and business
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Stirling A. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society [ J ]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007, 4(15) : 707 - 719.
  • 2权丽桃.《情报科学》2006-2010年高被引论文分析[J].情报科学,2012,30(4):559-562. 被引量:25
  • 3Bordons M, Morillo F, G6mez I. Analysis of Cross - disciplinary Research Through Bibliometric Tools [ M ]. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Re- search. Springer Netherlands, 2005.
  • 4Tijssen R J W. A quantitative assessment of interdisci- plinary structures in science and technology: Co - clas- sification analysis of energy research [ J]. Research Pol- icy, 1992, 21(I) :27 -44.
  • 5Klein J T. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisci- plinary research [ J ]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2008, 35(2):116- 123.
  • 6Lattuca L R. Creating interdisciplinarity: Grounded def- initions from college and university faculty [ J]. History of Intellectual Culture, 2003, 3 ( 1 ) : 1 - 20.
  • 7Porter A L, Roessner J D, Cohen A S, et al. Interdisci- plinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture [ J ]. Research Evaluation, 2006, 15(3): 187-195.
  • 8Carley S, Porter A L. A forward diversity index [ J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 90(2): 407-427.
  • 9孙粒,龚旭.中国大陆入选2014年汤森路透高被引论文作者分析[J].中国基础科学,2014,16(6):20-24. 被引量:3
  • 10贾佳,潘云涛,马峥.中国高被引科学家基本特征研究——以2014汤森路透高被引科学家为例[J].科技与出版,2014(12):149-151. 被引量:9

二级参考文献154

共引文献339

同被引文献156

引证文献14

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部