期刊文献+

禁止歧视的正当性依据及论争

Prohibition of Discrimination:The Legitimacy Basis and Debate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 歧视是一种区别对待的行为。禁止歧视的依据来源于法律规定和正当性的要求。当代关于禁止歧视的争论主要集中在是否应当禁止经济领域歧视和私人领域歧视这两方面的问题上。争论的实质在于:何种区别对待的行为可以判定为歧视,国家禁止歧视的界限如何判定。其实,判定直接歧视的标准是形式平等,判定间接歧视的标准则应侧重机会平等,无论是公共领域还是私人领域,只要判定为歧视的行为,国家都应当予以禁止。 Discrimination and the prohibition of discrimination is a debating theorists.The theoretical and practical requirements of prohibition of discrimination have a thorough study of the development,but there are a lot of controversy in the prohibition of discrimination.To demonstrate prohibition of discrimination is based on the concept of discrimination.It analysis the two typical classification of discrimination and the legal basis and legitimacy of the prohibition of discrimination.major contemporary debate on the prohibition of discrimination is whether it should prohibit discrimination in the economic field and whether it should prohibit discrimination in the private sphere.It discusses the essence of contemporary anti-discrimination debate.The Legitimate Basis of prohibition of discrimination is the substantive equality and substantive equality.Prohibition of discrimination should focus on formal equality and equal opportunity to grasp the limits of the prohibition of discrimination.
作者 王曼倩
出处 《福建行政学院学报》 2016年第3期57-62,共6页 Journal of Fujian Administration Institute
基金 山东青年政治学院博士科研启动基金项目(14A020)
关键词 歧视 直接歧视 间接歧视 形式平等 实质平等 Discrimination Direct Discrimination Indirect Discrimination Formal Equality Substantive Equality
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1李方平.“艾滋歧视第一案”开审,告教育局求平等就业权[EB/OL].(2010-10-14).http://news.sina.com.on/o/2010-10-14/070618229360s.shtml.
  • 2李薇薇.平等原则在反歧视法中的适用和发展--兼谈我国的反歧视立法[J].政法论坛,2009,27(1):126-134. 被引量:34
  • 3Richard A. Posner. The Effciency and Efficacy of Title VII[J]. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1987(2) : 513-521.
  • 4Richard A. Epstein. Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University , 1992 : 34.
  • 5约翰·葛雷.自由主义的两种面貌[M].蔡英文,译.台北:巨流图书公司,2002:12.
  • 6Roger Pilon. Discrimination, Affirmative Action and Freedom: Sorting out the Issues [M]. Washington: The American University Law Review, 1996:45.
  • 7周凯.全国相貌歧视第一案:双方都自称受害者[EB/OL].(2007-02-08).http://news.sina.com.cn/s/2007一02-08/025912258510.shtml.

二级参考文献17

  • 1凯塔琳娜·佛罗斯特尔 ,秘书处 .实质平等和非歧视法[J].环球法律评论,2005,27(1):18-22. 被引量:15
  • 2刘小楠.美国女权主义法学平等与差异观研究[J].法制与社会发展,2005,11(3):147-154. 被引量:17
  • 3国际劳工组织.《工作中平等的时代》,国际劳工大会第91届会议局长报告,2003年.
  • 4Hervey and O'Keeffe, Sex Equality in the European Union, Oxford University Press, 1996 ,p125.
  • 5Palmer v. Thompson, 403 U.S. 217(1971).
  • 6GEC v. Glbert, 429 U.S. 151,1976.
  • 7Enderby v. Frenchay, Health Authority and the Secretary of State for Health, 1 C. M. L. R 8, 1994.
  • 8B. Parekh and P Sanders, Race Relations in Britain, Routledge Press, 1998, p13 - 19.
  • 9C harpentier,The European Court of Justice and the Rhetoric of Affirmative Action,4 European Law Journal, 1998, p187.
  • 10欧盟《男女平等待遇指令》76/207/EEC(2002/73EC修订).

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部