期刊文献+

航空环境中情境意识的个体差异和任务难度差异检测:眼动测量技术的优势 被引量:9

Exploring the Individual and Task Difficulty Difference of Situation Awareness in Aviation Working Environment:The Advantages of Eye Tracking Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究包含两项实验分别探讨情境意识眼动测量技术在检验个体差异和任务难度差异中的优势。实验一采用情境意识评价技术和整体情境整体评价技术,测验新手、专家组飞行员特技飞行时的情境意识差异,实验二同样采用上述测验方法检验专家组飞行员在不同难度特技飞行时的情境意识差异,两项实验同时都监测被试的眼动过程。结果发现,(1)情境意识评价技术结果不能反映个体差异,能反映任务难度差异;(2)情境整体评价技术结果能够反映个体差异,不能反映任务难度差异;(3)经验和任务难度都影响飞行员的视觉取样策略和编码信息加工。眼动数据结果与情境整体评价技术的结果相互印证,可以确定眼动测量技术可测验情境意识,且相对于其他方法,眼动测量方法有更为广泛的差异敏感性。 With two experiments,the present study examined the sensitive advantages of eye tracking situation awareness method compared with two other measures,such as Situational Awareness Rating Technique( SART),Situation Global Assessment Technique( SGAT).The first experiment checked the individual differences,and the second checked the task difficulty differences. Results are three-folded. First,SART was not sensitive in distinguishing SA differences between experts and novices,but sensitive to task difficulty. Second,SAGAT was sensitive to individual differences,but not sensitive to task difficulty.Third,there were group differences between experts and novices in both visual sampling strategy and coding information procession,and there were also task differences in both of visual sampling strategy and coding information procession. Given that,the results from eye movement and SAGAT confirmed each other,and it is reasoned to conclude that eye movement data can track the situation awareness in the aviation working environment.Thus,the results suggest that eye movement measurement of situation awareness is sensitive both to individual and task differences.
作者 刘志方 苏衡
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2016年第1期12-25,共14页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 空后勤课题(DKJ09L036)
关键词 情境意识 主观测量 客观测量 眼动技术 situation awareness subjective techniques objective techniques eye movements
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Borghini, G. , Astolfi, L. , Veechiato, G. , Mattia, D. , & Babiloni, F. ( 2014 ). Measuring neurophysio- logical signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Re- views. 44(1) ,58,7.
  • 2Endsley,M. R. (1995a) Toward a theory of situa- tion awareness in dynamic systems. Human Fac- tors ,37( 1 ) ,32 - 64.
  • 3Endsley,M. R. (1995b). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors ,37 (1) ,65 -84.
  • 4Endsley, M. R. ( 2000a ). Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness : A critical rewview. In M. R. Endsley, D. J. Garland, Situation Awareness A- nalysis and Measurement. Mahwah, NI: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1 - 32.
  • 5Endsley, M. R. (2013). Situation awareness. In J. D. Lee & A. Kirlik (Eds.) , Oxford handbook of cognitive engineering. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer- sity Press,88 - 108.
  • 6Endsley, M. Ft. (2015a). Situation awareness mis- conceptions and misunderstandings. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making., 9( 1 ) ,4 - 32.
  • 7Endsley, M. R. (2015b). Final reflections : Situation awareness models and measures. Journal of Cog- nitive Engineering and Decision Making, 9 ( 1 ) , 101 - 111.
  • 8Federico,P. (1995). Expert and novice recognition of similar situations. Human Factors, 37 ( 1 ) : 105 - 122.
  • 9Jones, D. G. ( 2000 ). Subjective measures of situa- tion awareness. In M. R. Endsley, D. J. Garland, Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 113 - 128.
  • 10Kaber,D. B. , Perry, C. M. , Segall, N. , McClemon, C. K. , & Prinzel, L. J. (2006). Situation aware- ness implications of adaptive automation for infor- mation processing in an air traffic control-related task. International Journal of Industrial Ergonom- ics ,36( 5 ) ,447 - 462.

同被引文献58

引证文献9

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部