期刊文献+

自由的限度:再认识教育的正当性 被引量:26

The Limit of Freedom:Speculating on the Authoritativeness of Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文探讨了当下基础教育出现的一种不同于传统的理念型教育模式——"博放教育"。这不仅意味着中国社会的中上阶层与中下阶层在继承人的培养与精英的塑造策略上出现明显的分歧,也意味着教育最核心的部分发生了断裂:即教书与育人的分裂。本文先检讨了博放教育的制度逻辑——减负简单地将兴趣与努力对立,选课以差异性替代了共同性的培植,走班制提出集体之外成长;继而剖析博放教育背后的民情风尚:惟新是从切断了时问链条,平等否定了纵向的秩序,也否定了教育的权威性;最后诘问:看似摇摆于外在的严苛与内在的虚妄之间,实则严苛与虚妄内外合一,无根与无限互为因果。在此情势下,教育的正当性究竟何处安放? This paper focuses on the Expansionary Education,which is an untraditional ideal type that emerged in contemporary China.The emergence signifies that there are two aspects of divergence.On one side,the upper and lower classes have differences of opinion on the way the elite are cultivated.On the other side,the core of the education has been divided into instruction and Buildung.The structure of this paper is as follows.Firstly,it analyzes the institutional logic of the Expansionary Education:the Burden Reduction Policy simply leads to the conflict between interest and endeavor,the Course Selection results in emphasizing diversity as replacement for cultivating commonality,and the Class-Selection System advocates individualism.Secondly,this paper discusses the mores and fantasies of people in three layers,under the context of the Expansionary Education:the absolute obedience to innovation ignores the existence of historical heritage;the equality denies neither the hierarchy nor the authority of education.In the end,this paper raises a question.Seemingly,the educational system varies from external harshness and internal arrogance.Actually,harshness and arrogance are in essence the same,as they give rise to one another.Operating under this assumption,where should the authoritativeness of education be?
作者 刘云杉
出处 《北京大学教育评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期27-62,188-189,共36页 Peking University Education Review
基金 基金项目:北京市教科院"创新人才培养的课程体系研究"
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1[瑞]阿·布律迈尔.裴斯泰洛奇与当代教育[M].顾正祥译.北京:中央编译局,2012.
  • 2[法]阿兰.教育漫谈[A]王承绪,赵祥麟编译.西方现代教育论著选[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001.
  • 3[美]艾伦·布鲁姆.美国精神的封闭[M].战旭英译.南京:译林出版社,2007:216,213,12-14,122,280,139,22,207,205,143,154,131,97,138,301,250,306,29,63,39,75,77,85,16,41,7,293-294,294-295.
  • 4[法]爱弥儿·涂尔干.道德教育[M].译者:陈光金等上海:上海人民出版社,2001:157.
  • 5[西]奥尔特加·加塞特.大众的反叛[M].刘训练,佟德志译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2004.52.
  • 6[苏]B.A.苏霍姆林斯基.帕夫雷什中学[M].赵玮等译.北京:教育科学出版社,2013.
  • 7[美]巴格莱.要素主义者的纲领[A].王承绪,赵祥麟编译.西方现代教育论著选[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001.
  • 8[古希腊]柏拉图.理想国[M].郭斌和,张竹明,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002:82—22.
  • 9[美]布鲁姆.大学的民主化[A].应星,刘云杉译.张辉.巨人与侏儒[M].北京:华夏出版社,2003.
  • 10陈宝泉.《北京高等师范学校十周(年)纪念录》缘起[A].蔡振生等编.陈宝泉教育论著选[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1996.

二级参考文献71

  • 1王策三.迫切的要求和长期任务:提高教育质量[J].教育学术月刊,1999(3):2-8. 被引量:5
  • 2柏舟.言语理解过程中的记忆[J].现代外语,1989,12(3):1-7. 被引量:15
  • 3周南照.终身学习与教育的四大“支柱”[J].书摘,2003(11):88-91. 被引量:7
  • 4Posner,G.J.,Strike,K.A.,Hewson,P.W.,& Gertzog,W.A.(1982).Accommodation of scientific conception:Toward a theory of conceptual change.Science Education,66,211-227.
  • 5Gibbons,M.et al(1994).The New Production of Knowledge:The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.London:Sage Publications.
  • 6Margaret Mead,Continuities in Cultural Evolution,Yale University Press,New Haven,Conn.,1964.p.79.
  • 7Biggs,J.B.(1985) The Role of Metalearning in Study Processes,British Journal of Educational Psychology,55,185-212.
  • 8Sawyer.R.K(ed),2006.The Cambridge Handbook of The Learning Sciences.p.4.
  • 9约翰·D.布兰思福特等编.《人是如何学习的》,程可拉等译,华东师范大学出版社2002年版,第266页.
  • 10杜威 赵祥麟 译.学校与社会·明日之学校[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1994,12..

共引文献985

同被引文献219

引证文献26

二级引证文献142

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部