期刊文献+

臂丛神经阻滞3种定位方法的效果观察及护理配合 被引量:1

The effect observation and nursing cooperation of three kinds of positioning of brachial plexus block
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨臂丛神经阻滞3种定位方法的临床效果及护理配合。方法:选择102例拟行上肢手术的患者并随机等分为3组,对3组患者进行臂丛神经阻滞分别采用B超定位、神经刺激仪定位和传统盲探定位。比较3组患者麻醉起效时间、麻醉效果及并发症的发生。结果:B超引导组患者的神经阻滞起效时间短于神经刺激仪定位组和传统盲探定位组患者,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。B超引导组患者的麻醉效果优于其他两组,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:B超定位引导下臂丛神经阻滞在起效时间短,麻醉效果好,且并发症少。 Objective: To explore the clinical effect and nursing cooperation of three kinds of positioning methods of brachial plexus block. Methods: Selected102 cases patients of upper extremity surgery and divided them into three groups at random. The B- scan ultrasonography positioning,neurostimulator positioning and traditional blind detective location were had respectively in brachial plexus block of three groups patients. The onset time of anesthesia,anesthesia effect and complication occurrence of three groups were compared. Results: The nerve block onset time of patients in B- scan ultrasonography direct group was shorter than neurostimulator positioning group and traditional blind detective location group. The comparison difference among groups was of statistic significance( P〈 0. 05). The anesthesia effect of B- scan ultrasonography direct group patients was better than other two groups,the comparison difference among groups was of statistic significance( P 〈0. 05). Conclusion: Under the guidance of B- scan ultrasonography positioning,the onset time of brachial plexus block was short,its anesthesia effect was good and its complication was less.
出处 《护理实践与研究》 2016年第10期62-63,共2页 Nursing Practice and Research
基金 2013年广东省江门市科技计划项目(江科[2013]83号)
关键词 臂丛神经阻滞 B超引导 神经刺激仪 传统定位 护理 Brachial plexus block B-scan ultrasonography direct Neurostimulator Traditional positioning Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1傅洪,魏安宁.超声与神经阻滞[J].临床超声医学杂志,2005,7(4):270-272. 被引量:15
  • 2卢博一.美国口腔镇痛镇静与麻醉的发展史及其贡献和展望[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(6):858-860. 被引量:5
  • 3RETZL G,KAPPA s,GREHER M. et al. Ultrasonographic findingsof the axillary part of the brachial plexus. Anesth Analg,2001,92 :1271 - 1275.
  • 4SANDHU N,CAPAN L. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachialplexus block. Br J Anaesth,2002,89 :254-259.
  • 5Marhofer P, Schrogendorfer K, Wallner T, et al. Ultrasonographicguidance reduces the amount of local anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks.Reg Anesth Pain Med, 1998,23(6) :584-588.
  • 6CAPDEVILA X, BIBOULET P, MORAU D, et al. How and why to use ultrasound for regional blockade [ J ]. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg, 2008, 59(3) : 147 - 154.
  • 7Capdevila X, Biboulet P, MorauD, et al.How and why to use uhrasound for regional blockade.Acta Anaesthesiol Be|g, 2008,59( 3 ) : 147-154.
  • 8Brodner, et al. Acute pain management: analysis, implica- tions and consequences after prospective experience with 6349 surgical patients [ J ]. Eur Anaesthesiol, 2000,17 ( 9 ) : 566 -575.
  • 9Antonucci, S. Adiuvants in the axillary brachial plexus blockade. Comparison between clonidine, sufentanil and tramadol [ J ]. Minerva Anestesio1,2001,67 (1-2) :23-27.
  • 10Nguyen, H.C. , et al. Transscalene brachial plexus block : a new posterolateral approach for brachial plexus block [ J ]. Anesth Analg,2007,105 ( 3 ) :872-875.

共引文献97

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部