期刊文献+

现行法律框架内对虚假仲裁案外人权益保护的路径探讨 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 仲裁作为替代性纠纷解决机制,因其灵活、便捷、高效等优势而在民商事领域中被广泛适用。在司法机关对虚假诉讼进行严厉打击的背景下,利用虚假仲裁进行欺诈的现象日益凸显,仲裁案外人权益受损严重。虚假仲裁作为仲裁功能异化的产物,法律应予以规制与纠正。通过分析现行法律框架内对虚假仲裁案外人权益保护的可能路径,发现现行法律未能提供有效的权利救济渠道。通过分析我国实践需要和立法缺失并结合借鉴域外立法情况,寻求完善虚假仲裁案外人权益保护的新路径,对于完善仲裁制度促进仲裁发展具有现实意义。 Arbitration, as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, is widely applied in the field of civil and commercial matters, for it is flexible, convenient and efficient. Under the background that the judicial authorities crack down on bogus lawsuits, the phenomena of using false arbitration for fraud are growing obvious,so people's rights severely damaged outside the arbitration. Laws should regulate and correct the false arbitration, because the false arbitration is the outcome of arbitration function alienation. Actually, current laws have failed to provide effective rights relief channels, after analyzing possible ways to protect people's rights outside the false arbitration within the framework of current laws. By analyzing practical needs and lack of legislation in China, also in combination with legislation abroad, we find that new ways to protect people's rights outside the false arbitration have practical significance for perfecting the arbitration system and promoting the development of arbitration.
作者 李贤森
出处 《北京仲裁》 2016年第1期20-39,共20页 Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
关键词 虚假仲裁 案外人 救济路径 申请撤销 撤销之诉 false arbitration outsider relief path apply for cancellation cancellation suit
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部