摘要
目的对糖尿病合并高血压患者在治疗当中所采取的护理干预方法进行深入的探讨,且对其取得的疗效情况展开分析。方法将该院与2014年3月—2015年9月收治的60例患者确定为分析对象,其中30例患者采取的是护理干预,另30例患者采取的是常规护理,对两组患者的效果进行对比,并对两组患者在经过护理之后的血糖、血压控制状况、及平时习惯的改变情况进行密切的关注。结果通过采取护理干预,观察组舒张压(75.9±3.7)mm Hg与收缩压(124.3±11.4)mm Hg均值都处于正常区间,且比对照组的值要低;观察组空腹血糖(5.2±0.4)mmol/L与餐后2 h血糖(5.4±0.3)mmol/L均值都明显小于对照组,该两组患者的舒张压、收缩压、以及空腹血糖和餐后2 h血糖对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于糖尿病合并高血压的患者,采取有效、适合的护理干预,如心理、以及饮食与运动护理等,是一种可明显改善治疗效果的、至关重要的干预方式,值得临床推广。
Objective To explore the nursing intervention methods in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus complicated with hypertension, and to analyze the curative effect. Methods 60 cases of patients identified as the analysis object,which take 30 patients is nursing intervention and another 30 cases were treated by is routine nursing care, pay close attention to the effect of two groups of patients were compared, and the two groups of patients in the after care of blood glucose,blood pressure control, and usually accustomed to the change. Results By nursing intervention, the observation group diastolic blood pressure(75.9 3.7 mm Hg) and systolic blood pressure(124.3 + 11.4 mm Hg) mean are in the normal range and than in the control group to low values; observation group, fasting blood glucose(5.2 + 0.4 mmol / L) and postprandial 2H plasma glucose(5.4 + 0.3 mmol / L) mean are significantly less than those in control group, the two groups of patients with diastolic pressure, systolic blood pressure, and fasting and postprandial 2H blood glucose compared with significant differences(P 〈0.05), there is statistical significance. Conclusion For patients with diabetes mellitus complicated with hypertension, take effectively, appropriate nursing intervention, psychological, and diet and exercise care is a can significantly improve the therapeutic effect, critical interventions, it is worth clinical promotion.
出处
《糖尿病新世界》
2016年第9期129-130,共2页
Diabetes New World Magazine
关键词
糖尿病
高血压
护理干预
空腹血糖
Diabetes mellitus
Hypertension
Nursing intervention
Fasting blood glucose